Quote Originally Posted by KAPA View Post
From listening to liberal anti-gun types in the past, they are convinced that as long as you have a single shot .22 and are only allowed to possess one bullet at a time, they are doing you and the 2A a huge favor. This is what people mean when they say they support 2A and then follow that up with "BUT"...
And the "BUT" keeps changing.

Soon 2A will only protect your right to own a pointed stick. Provided the length of pointy end is appropriate for what an activist judge says.

I just want these "judges" to reconcile precedent with the words that are coming out of their mouths. An arbitrary limitation in inherently unConstitutional. Lots of cases point this out.