SB 14-93 Repeal the Background Check for private sales

[cstone]

Here are the two responses I've received so far:

Re: SB 14-93 Repeal the Background Check for private sales
Irene Aguilar (ireneaguilar.md@gmail.com)
Add to contacts
1/24/14


To: cstone
Thank you for participating in the legislative process, I value your input.

I am in the process of reviewing this bill and the opinions and research around the policies they propose. I will consider all sides before I make any decisions.

Senator Aguilar

Re: SB 14-93 Repeal the Background Check for private sales‏
Senator Bernie Herpin (bernie.herpin@outlook.com)
Add to contacts
10:44 AM


To: cstone

Thank you for contacting me about SB 14-094 concerning background checks. I am a Senate co-sponsor and will support this bill.

I am also a Senate co-prime sponsor on a bill that will repeal the magazine limit.

Sincerely,

Bernie Herpin
Senator, District 11
(303) 866-6364 (Senate Office)
(719) 596-3921 (Home)
www.bernieherpin.com
Sent from my iPhone

[centrarchidae]

Here are the two responses I've received so far:

Re: SB 14-93 Repeal the Background Check for private sales
Irene Aguilar (ireneaguilar.md@gmail.com)
Add to contacts
1/24/14


To: cstone
Thank you for participating in the legislative process, I value your input.

Yes, Senator Doctor Agular (she's an MD, by the way, just in case you forgot, and DON'T YOU DARE HONK AT HER!) values your input.

That's not her pissing on your leg. That's the drought being over. No, really.

Unless she looks at FORMER Senator Angela Giron, and sees her own fate.

[merl]

Yes, Senator Doctor Agular (she's an MD, by the way, just in case you forgot, and DON'T YOU DARE HONK AT HER!) values your input.

That's not her pissing on your leg. That's the drought being over. No, really.

Unless she looks at FORMER Senator Angela Giron, and sees her own fate.

So what is better, a form letter response or no response at all?

[TFOGGER]

According to the CBI's year end stats, there were a total of 32 denials on private sales.Given an appeal success rate of roughly 70%, that means the new law kept a whopping 9 people from illegally obtaining a weapon.Maybe, assuming they didn't just go buy one illegally. All of the others would have been stopped by the previous law.

[BlasterBob]

So, if a BATF Agent observes a firearm transfer being made by two individuals here in Colorado and he somehow absolutely knows there has been no legitimate BGC, is it his/her duty to advise the proper local CO LEO of this violation? Apparently the Federal enforcement and/ or prosecuting people feel such violations of wrongfully completing Form 4473 (perjury) is not worth pursuing, why then even have such laws on the books if they are NOT going to be actively enforced. Also, when BATF legal beagles were assembling the wording for Form 4473, do you think they were convinced that the perjury charge would be enforceable/prosecutable or did they believe that it might just be an excellent scare tactic??????