Liberals want military to rid the country of the tea party

[Zundfolge]

Do they want an insurgency that would make everything before it pale in comparison?

Yes they do, because the instant Tea Partiers (and other patriotic Americans) stand up to defend themselves with force, they have a pretext to put the jackboot on all our necks that they've been hoping for since the 1960s.

THIS is why Obama has been purging the military of conservatives and constitutionalists and packing it with homosexuals and women (whom they presume are all fellow-traveler leftists, or at least will blindly follow their illegal orders).

[sniper7]

I'd like the government to create a super pill that cures liberalism.

[streetglideok]

For entertainment purposes, you should read some of the other stories as well. If it wasn't for the fact we have been hearing similar dialogue from other socialist-democrats, and the recent statement from Cuomo in NY, we could blow this story off as tinfoil fodder, to which it partially is. Fact is, the real free thinkers are being singled out, and calls for militant removal of them, gov't harassment, and all but outright expulsion from a state are happening now. The next four years may very will be the defining moments of our country, as to where we are heading. 2014 mid term elections, 2016 Presidential and congressional elections. If we take the senate in 2014, will the king feel cornered and lash out? If another obamanite takes office in 2016, will they consider that proof that the populace supports an authoritarian regime and take matters into their own hands?

[Skip]

Yes they do, because the instant Tea Partiers (and other patriotic Americans) stand up to defend themselves with force, they have a pretext to put the jackboot on all our necks that they've been hoping for since the 1960s.

THIS is why Obama has been purging the military of conservatives and constitutionalists and packing it with homosexuals and women (whom they presume are all fellow-traveler leftists, or at least will blindly follow their illegal orders).

Yes, force is not enough. It's a moral mandate for force that is required. If Team Gov is perceived to fire the first shot, they lose the mandate. If Team Liberty is perceived to fire the first shot, they lose moral justification for defense.

This is the game we are playing.

Once disarmament is complete, the dynamics change. Team gov no longer needs the Peoples' support to apply force as they have a monopoly. That is the time when inconvenient people can be murdered in masse and the game playing ends. The Liberal justification for this has already been laid; go out and read what they are saying about Conservatives and "white" culture (which is nuts because not all Conservative Americans are white, but you get the point).

[zteknik]

Talk about conflict of interest.

I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic....

[Bailey Guns]

I'd like the government to create a super pill that cures liberalism.

We already have them in varying dosages. It's just illegal to administer them.

[HoneyBadger]

Didn't the King of England try something similar?

yup. It turned into a real f*cking mess.

These guys are getting bold. Conservatives are no longer welcome in NY. Sen Schumer wants the IRS to keep going after the Tea Party. These guys want to use the military...the other side is publicly calling for the "elimination" of strong conservatives. This is a big deal but the media is basically laughing it off...

Of course they are laughing it off... It only empowers them. Why would they be worried?

Do they want an insurgency that would make everything before it pale in comparison?

Apparently.

God I hope so, only so that I can deal with it rather than my future children.

God, I hope not, for the sole reason that I have already started my family and I don't want them to pay for it with blood.

Yes they do, because the instant Tea Partiers (and other patriotic Americans) stand up to defend themselves with force, they have a pretext to put the jackboot on all our necks that they've been hoping for since the 1960s.

Yep. See "moral justification" below.

THIS is why Obama has been purging the military of conservatives and constitutionalists and packing it with homosexuals and women (whom they presume are all fellow-traveler leftists, or at least will blindly follow their illegal orders).

That is certainly an interesting perspective. Not sure about homosexuals or women, but the common ranks of the .mil have been swinging left for a while.

Yes, force is not enough. It's a moral mandate for force that is required. If Team Gov is perceived to fire the first shot, they lose the mandate. If Team Liberty is perceived to fire the first shot, they lose moral justification for defense.

This is the game we are playing.

Once disarmament is complete, the dynamics change. Team gov no longer needs the Peoples' support to apply force as they have a monopoly.

Very true. Sadly.

Talk about conflict of interest.

I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic....

Indeed.

[sniper7]

We already have them in varying dosages. It's just illegal to administer them.

lets make it something super hip that liberals are into, or design it into air filters for Prius'.

[Gman]

lets make it something super hip that liberals are into, or design it into air filters for Prius'.

I think he may be referring to pills that are not dosed in milligrams, but rather grains.