Close
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner merl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    longmont
    Posts
    1,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Yes!

    I would argue it's not for enforcement of the current "law" but for confiscation. And that is why the grabbers are so angered. Moms Demanding Action are very demanding.

    In the heart of every Liberal is a little dictator who knows that as long as those weapons are in the hands of civilians, they have the means to resist.
    That remains to be seen. Worst case is the existing law is strictly enforced now against those that did not register then in a few years after next nutcase they round up the registered ones.

  2. #2
    Grand Master Know It All hatidua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    4,096

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by merl View Post
    after next nutcase they round up the registered ones.
    I cannot think of any other legitimate reason to create a database of owners/addresses.

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner merl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    longmont
    Posts
    1,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hatidua View Post
    I cannot think of any other legitimate reason to create a database of owners/addresses.
    The first half of my sentence, remove them as encountered from all those that did not register. Enforcement without registration is not feasible. Consider how enforceable the mag ban passed here would be if there was a list of allowed owners. Who cares if the mags are the ones they had when they registered, by registering they effectively signed up for a permit to possess "high cap" mags.

    The roundup is the next cut, first get the "illegal" ones.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •