Connecticut to Confiscate

[KS63]

I'd like to see the politicians who support this go door to door confiscating the guns. That shit will change real quick.

[HoneyBadger]

I'd like to see the politicians who support this go door to door confiscating the guns. That shit will change real quick.

Of course that would never happen. These are not honest people we are dealing with here.

[merl]

They might use dirty tactics, jail and confiscate one at a time when someone got pulled over and busted for owning one without registering.

This
A well publicized test case, ideally with someone who cannot possess for some other reason, would ensure the other unregistered ones never see daylight.

[Gcompact30]

MOVE OUT OF TOWN QUICK!!!!!!

[sniper7]

Very interested to see what happens here. Hoping somebody takes a stand....

[clublights]

Very interested to see what happens here. Hoping somebody takes a stand....

hopefully a lot of somebody's

1 is a easy to hide " criminal"
100 is a crazy cult that had it coming
1000 is hard to ignore
10000 has a fighting chance to win.
100000 wins the battle.

[stevelkinevil]

I can tell you this. Of course many in LE will comply, many will comply begrudgingly. Many still will not. One emboldens the other. It is a personal matter, and every man will make his choice, and as more make the choice they know is right more will join. The snowball becomes the avalanche.

[HoneyBadger]

hopefully a lot of somebody's

1 is a easy to hide " criminal"
100 is a crazy cult that had it coming
1000 is hard to ignore
10000 has a fighting chance to win.
100000 wins the battle.

I would think that 10,000 would be enough to win is one. How many cops in CT are willing to die to follow an order that they have moral qualms about? (Of course I hope it never comes to that.... we would basically drop to 3rd world country status overnight.)

the real issue is that if there ARE 100,000, they need to know that they are not alone and that they have 99,999 others behind them.

worst case scenario: I think if the IRS or DHS or some other illegitimate government organization picked just a few to make examples of, a lot of good people would roll over because it is not worth the risk to have that happen to them, especially their family.

[streetglideok]

They'll operate with the idea, divide and conquer. One at a time, sporadically to get the rest to roll over on their rights. Re-examine Ruby Ridge and Mt Carmel in Waco and what unfolded there. The feds ran a good smear campaign against Koresh. With Weaver, I don't think they were able to pull that off at the time of the stand off. IIRC, wasn't there a growing local presence where they were staging during the standoff, making the feds growingly uncomfortable? Both cases, the feds ultimate goal was to just kill them all off to cover up any mishandling IMO. One could speculate that the locals may have pushed the feds to negotiate and resolve the matter peacefully. Either way, it was a federal agent, a cop, that had no issue with killing an unarmed mother holding a baby, and his partner said he would have done the same.

[<MADDOG>]

I think some of your conclusions are pretty bold there street...

Back on point, I researched my own question: CT does have it's own "database" via the "Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection". However in my brief search, I did not find how long the state had been collecting data ( I seen 1993 mentioned somewhere).

Which leads me to another question: how much data does the CBI collect?