Another shooting at Ft Hood

[Great-Kazoo]

Now saying at least 4 dead and 14 wounded including shooter. They say it's a "soldier on soldier" incident. I hope not. That just adds more fuel for the anti's

What fuel for the anti's?
The /mil changed procedure for on base incidents. The only fuel it provides is for PRO-GUN folks to reinforce having a gun can save lives, in situations like this.
Hassan was "soldier on soldier" OR as our fearless leader said, workplace violence

[merl]

What fuel for the anti's?
The /mil changed procedure for on base incidents. The only fuel it provides is for PRO-GUN folks to reinforce having a gun can save lives, in situations like this.
Hassan was "soldier on soldier" OR as our fearless leader said, workplace violence

Not sure how the it can be spun against guns but sure it will be. It does show that even the guys we trust with friggin tanks are defenseless in gun free zones. Who do they call? Police with guns.

[mtnrider]

What fuel for the anti's?
The /mil changed procedure for on base incidents. The only fuel it provides is for PRO-GUN folks to reinforce having a gun can save lives, in situations like this.
Hassan was "soldier on soldier" OR as our fearless leader said, workplace violence

Fuel as in no one can be trusted with a gun. All soldiers are mental defects. Anyone can buy a gun and go on a shooting spree. Need I go on?

[Logan]

FOX reporting name of the shooter as Spc Ivan Lopez

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

[GilpinGuy]

I just heard the tail end of Obummers speech about this. I wanted to throw my damn ham and cheese sandwich at the TV. I wonder how he'll try to use this to his advantage.

[Gman]

Something tells me that soldiers being allowed to carry their sidearms would limit these types of events.

[mtnrider]

Something tells me that soldiers being allowed to carry their sidearms would limit these types of events.

Amazingly, the General in charge of the base completely disagrees with that and wants no part of soldiers (other then leo) carrying weapons. He made that very clear in his press conference when someone asked that quesition

[KAPA]

Amazingly, the General in charge of the base completely disagrees with that and wants no part of soldiers (other then leo) carrying weapons. He made that very clear in his press conference when someone asked that quesition

Probably because he wants to keep being a General and get another star.

If a member of the military can not be trusted to carry a loaded sidearm, then that person should not be in the military. We give them machine guns, bombs, grenades, missiles and fighter jets but giving them the responsibility to carry a sidearm is too much?

[Ronin13]

Probably because he wants to keep being a General and get another star.

If a member of the military can not be trusted to carry a loaded sidearm, then that person should not be in the military. We give them machine guns, bombs, grenades, missiles and fighter jets but giving them the responsibility to carry a sidearm is too much?

This was my thought exactly. They trust us with weapons, loaded, 24/7 downrange... But back home? Where we should have expect damn near absolute safety? Oh better not... Stupid I tell you. I just don't understand that DOD policy.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

[TEAMRICO]

Link to a pic of the scumbag.
This dirtbag seems to have been a SPC for quite a few years.

http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/unthinkab...rt-hood-again/