Actually you are correct. Until he is convicted, this is just accusation. If we do not afford him the FULL ability to defend himself openly and honestly, the Constitution means nothing. Each and ever one of use could be put in his shoes and falsely accused to further other agendas. I am not saying that is what is happening here but I will not condemn a person until proven guilty. If he is convicted by a jury of his peers.... There is a special ring in hell waiting for him (but not until the convicts get first crack, I understand they take this one personal)







Reply With Quote
