bone-fide has a definition so it doesn't need one in code.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_fide
It means a real gift, no compensation expected or received, no favors owed. Given, over & done.
bone-fide has a definition so it doesn't need one in code.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_fide
It means a real gift, no compensation expected or received, no favors owed. Given, over & done.
Last edited by merl; 04-29-2014 at 07:18.
It just terrifies me that a LEO comes on the forum and asks if the law still applies to him and his "special status" as a LEO.
![]()
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind
what's interesting is that (and not so much here) on other forums people will say "ask a cop," or "i checked with the local police....." about a legal issue. Thinking the average cop knows the law (clearly many don't -- or just don't care--given noted OC confrontations) is an absurd notion. If that's cop bashing, so be it, but it's quite true and said without hyperbole.
Last edited by Gunner; 04-29-2014 at 10:40.
"There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
"The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."
Last edited by rbeau30; 04-29-2014 at 11:48.
I think this thread is long past it's effectiveness. The question has been answered and personal opinions have been given.
The short answer is that ALL transfers for personal use firearms must go through a Background Check to comply with existing state law. ETA: I failed to acknowledge the exception for transferring to IMMEDIATE family members via gift.
Revised: Watch your comments here. Some of you are hovering mighty close to the line and I really don't want anyone getting themselves in trouble here on the site. I understand why this question is offensive to many of you but gentle nudges get better results than personal attacks. While it appears that the OP was asking in order to avoid having to go through the BGC route on a personal transfer if there was an exception, it's possible that he was seeking clarification after an LEO informed him that it wasn't required. Let's not jump to conclusions without the full picture. Even with the full picture, DO NOT start with personal attacks. We can attack and turn someone against us or we can gently educate and win an ally.
Be safe. Be legal. Be smart.
Ginsue out.
Ginsue - Admin
Proud Infidel Since 1965
"You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020
Ginsue's Feedback
Thank you GINSUE....My original post was purely meant as a clarificting question..I was asking because of a PERSONAL transfer between 2 LEO's...In no way was my inquiry meant to be illusive towards the law I am SWORN to uphold and PROTECT. Im almost appaled in the negative responses JUMPING to the conclusion of dishonesty. I thank those who were honorable in answering the question. I'm not a fan of the new laws either, but with all the 'legalize' I wanted to know for sure.
Legitimate question. In other states, sworn officers are exempt from a BGC because of the position they hold. LE officers are entrusted to carry a firearm every day and additional BGCs for them are nothing but a waste of time and money.
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind