Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30
  1. #11
    Machine Gunner osok-308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    1,596

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rockhound View Post
    there is no reason for these groups to be armed.
    This ^^^^ however it won't happen.
    I don't make the rules. I just think them up and write them down.

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    I don't think BLM or HHS should have SWAT teams but I also disagree with the idea of disarming all agencies. Some (repeat, some) of the Park Service and Border Patrol have very difficult situations and should have arms for personal defense or varmint control. IRS should have to go through the local sheriff's department for armed enforcement IMO although I'm not sure what they'd do in a case like Al Capone's Chicago. Then again, the only things I like about Chicago are the pizza, hot dogs, and Sean Connery's line in The Untouchables.
    i believe agencies that have law enforcement duties such as the border patrol or park rangers are included in the plan.
    Self control: The minds ability to override the body's urge to beat the living sh.. out of some ass.... who desperately deserves it.

    The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

    Thomas Jefferson


    Obama, so full of crap it is a miracle Air Force One can even get off the ground,

  3. #13
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kidicarus13 View Post
    These agencies will not be disarmed... next topic.
    Yup, nothing to see here.
    Move along and pick up that can citizen.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  4. #14
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    Wouldn't it be better if all citizens who want to be armed were armed? If the government can subsidize food, healthcare, retirement, cell phones, etc... it would be helpful if they would provide tax breaks for the purchase and maintenance of firearms and ammunition by law abiding citizens.

    I have a dream!
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

  5. #15
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hayden, COLORADO
    Posts
    607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rockhound View Post
    there is no reason for these groups to be armed.
    Yea there is. The reason is clear, if you think about it....

  6. #16
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,817
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstone View Post
    Wouldn't it be better if all citizens who want to be armed were armed? If the government can subsidize food, healthcare, retirement, cell phones, etc... it would be helpful if they would provide tax breaks for the purchase and maintenance of firearms and ammunition by law abiding citizens.

    I have a dream!
    I'd vote for that.
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  7. #17
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    There are PLENTY of non-military Federal employees that need to be armed.

    BAD IDEA- BLM SWAT Team
    GOOD IDEA- BATF Inspector with a sidearm.
    BAD IDEA- IRS Strike Force with full-auto M4s.
    GOOD IDEA- Postal Fraud Inspector with a sidearm.

    Why would you deny them the right to self defense when you cherish it for private citizens?

  8. #18
    Amateur meat smoker blacklabel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Greeley
    Posts
    6,557

    Default

    You missed the "special units" part of the article, didn't you?

  9. #19
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blacklabel View Post
    You missed the "special units" part of the article, didn't you?
    No. There are many people question arming even the most obvious of federal personnel.

  10. #20
    Machine Gunner ZERO THEORY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    Yup, nothing to see here.
    Move along and pick up that can citizen.
    Awesome Half Life 2 reference.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •