Close
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47
  1. #21
    Don of the Asian Mafia ChunkyMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    8,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    These are old arguments. As long as the DA office refuse to prosecute business owners, whichever way you do it is pointless. Whether it's a check point or business place warranted raid, individual like you and I will always cry out privacy infringement or harassment -- NONE works obviously. And don't get me started on how the Social Security Admin is tight lip about how much SS benefit they collects on 'fake' and misused SSNs.

    There is delicate balance between state security and individual freedom.
    E.G.
    1. I want the fed to be more aggressive on illegal immigrations, but I am against National ID/Finger Printing!
    2. I want strong border patrol, but I hate to be treated like illegals (supposedly equally) whenever I am close to the border!
    3. I want strong coast guard, but I dont want to be hailed everytime I go beyond few miles off shore for deep sea fishing!

    Why in the hell border patrol wants to have a check point miles and miles within the border while they cannot even secure the damn border itself is beyond me though.
    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    It doesn't matter how many rifles you buy...they're still cheaper than one wife, in the long run.
    Coarf Feedback
    Instagram

  2. #22
    Paper Hunter jackmode9316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Lakewood
    Posts
    268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sturtle View Post
    I've been thinking about police dogs lately. It seems to me that it'd be pretty easy to train a dog to bark at a car with a code word. Then, you could search whoever you wanted, whenever you wanted.
    I dont think the actual cops assigned to the dogs are the ones who train them though. But I see what you mean.
    Assault is a type of behavior, not a type of hardware.

  3. #23
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    TN/ ex-CO
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    I've met two police dogs. Great at there work they were!

  4. #24
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    For the record, I don't actually believe people train police dogs to bark at cars on command, but it wouldn't be difficult. It likely WOULD be a waste of time though. I think that most cops, even the ones who are the biggest assholes in the world, are a million times more interested in busting someone who is actually running drugs, than they are in ruining joe schmoe's day.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  5. #25
    Don of the Asian Mafia ChunkyMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    8,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I would subpoena that dog and show the court hundred other things that the dog will bark at! That's such a lame excuse for them to infringe upon your right.
    Last edited by ChunkyMonkey; 05-18-2009 at 23:34.
    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    It doesn't matter how many rifles you buy...they're still cheaper than one wife, in the long run.
    Coarf Feedback
    Instagram

  6. #26
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foxtrot View Post
    Sick and tired of the "well they work for the government, so they must have done something wrong, and they are all out to get you" logic applied to EVERYTHING.
    I'm glad you brought this up, as I was just thinking about this the other. If people think that just because someone is a government employee, that they are insiders on some power grabbing plan, they are sadly mistaken.

    That is why spending so much time on line is dangerous. It's too easy to forget that the people working for the gov are still just clueless people trying to make a living.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bailey CO
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    It's too easy to forget that the people working for the gov are still just clueless people trying to make a living.[/quote]


    True. so True.. just look at the IRS,, alot of idiots that don't know the law but still,, uhh,, well enforce something...

  8. #28
    Don of the Asian Mafia ChunkyMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    8,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mtn.man View Post


    True. so True.. just look at the IRS,, alot of idiots that don't know the law but still,, uhh,, well enforce something...
    LMAO! that goes the same with all the I_S. Ginsue, your friend IS the smarter one of the two... I always comply when being asked by an LE, some times I do ask for specific reason if the 'request' was very unreasonable. (Got pulled over for speeding..then they ask to pop my trunk. huh?!). Most LEOs treat you with respect as soon as they know you understand your right. Moreover, LEOs don't want to waste your time as much as theirs anyway.

    Others might feel there is a need to thump his chest - bah.. I dont have the time... usually I wasted enough time trying to follow the german accented GPS instruction in this damn car.
    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    It doesn't matter how many rifles you buy...they're still cheaper than one wife, in the long run.
    Coarf Feedback
    Instagram

  9. #29
    My Fancy Title gnihcraes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    CastleRock/Lakewood
    Posts
    4,426

    Default

    just about 3 years ago: My father was returning from a Hog hunting trip in Southern Texas, as he does each year. You have to pass through a checkpoint in texas, usually no problem, as this time was, no issue. Where it became a problem was down by pueblo, State Patrol stopped him because he fit the "profile" of older gent, in run down old truck, coming from the south. The officer stopped him because the license plate was not completely legible. (dirt/mud) Asked him if she could search his vehicle. He was a little puzzled, but agreed to the search, as he had absolutely nothing to hide. Backup troopers arrived and she stripped the truck down to every last piece of dirt... when one of the other troopers told him that he didn't have to agree to the search and they would just go away. He kindly told them that he didn't agree to the search. She had to stop immediately and put everything back in my dads truck. (btw - is usually a pit full of hunting "stuff" and a complete mess) She was pissed. Dad also let them know that Texas had the check point on highway coming up from the south and that it usually wouldn't be necessary for them in colorado to do it again. They were not aware Texas had the checkpoints. So they put everything back in the truck and said have a nice day... off he went back into denver. Just remember, you don't have to consent to the search.

  10. #30
    Machine Gunner Circuits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Colofornia Springs, CO
    Posts
    2,411

    Default

    Papieren, bitte!
    "The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
    NRA Life, GOA Life, SAF Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor Circuits' Feedback

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •