Close
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
  1. #11
    Machine Gunner Musashi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Erie, CO
    Posts
    1,666

    Default

    Definite +1 for the Garand
    It shoots better than I can most days and is smooth as a 30-06 can be.
    Sometimes walnut and steel trump plastic and aluminum
    I would never give my IH up!

  2. #12
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Colo. Springs
    Posts
    972

    Default

    The NM USGI barrel is the same contour as a regular barrel. Four grooves as are most service barrels (some service were two groove).
    The NM barrels are guaged more tightly and are not allowed to have a larger bore diameter at the muzzle than the chamber. Service barrels have a small tolerance.
    The NM barrels are stamped "NM" above the gas cylinder area.

  3. #13
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cheyenne, Wyoming
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    Yep. I was just reading up on Glen Nelson built rifles. He also did M1 rifles in the earlier years for the USAMU. Barrel tolerances were very precise, as well as headspace. And most of the other parts were hand selected for quality.

  4. #14
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    I presume the M1D's and similar M1's were somewhat assembled for accuracy too???
    Although I was in the Army small repair in the mid-50's when the M1 Garand was THE main battle rifle, I never did come across any M1C's or M1D's.
    Last edited by BlasterBob; 07-06-2014 at 11:10.

  5. #15
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cheyenne, Wyoming
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    If I remember correctly, the M1C and D were mostly standard rifles with scopes. Some may have shot better than others, but no special parts were selected.

  6. #16
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmg8550 View Post
    If I remember correctly, the M1C and D were mostly standard rifles with scopes. Some may have shot better than others, but no special parts were selected.
    This sounds right. At one time, while working in Ordnance Supply in Fort Riley, I could have easily got myself a handful of the mounts and scopes for the M1D's but had no interest at the time and really preferred not to do any "bad time".

  7. #17
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cheyenne, Wyoming
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    That must have been quite the sight to see. Were the receivers drilled for a scope mount? I've never personally looked a C or D over. Most are too expensive to handle.

  8. #18
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmg8550 View Post
    That must have been quite the sight to see. Were the receivers drilled for a scope mount? I've never personally looked a C or D over. Most are too expensive to handle.
    At one time I was the legal owner of an M1D but as you indicated they are just too expensive. So I got rid of it for something that I could shoot and enjoy without the worry about depreciation due to my use or abuse.

  9. #19
    Death Eater Troublco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    KFSU (Ft. Sumner, NM)
    Posts
    4,927

    Default M1 Garand Question?

    I used to shoot an issue USAF M1A1 (7.62x51) Garand that was NM, and that gun would outshoot my NM M1A all the time. It had one of the Rock Island 7.62 match barrels and a very high gloss stock. I had a .308 Garand built when I had to turn the issue gun in, I liked it so much. One thing I have not seen mentioned yet is the NM trigger mod. More of a trigger job than a mod, but still part of the NM process. Also, the sights are unique to the NM gun with the rear having a hooded aperture that when rotated 180' gives you a 1/2 MOA adjustment vertically and the front being one of two specific widths.
    Last edited by Troublco; 07-10-2014 at 22:35. Reason: add info
    SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM

    Herding cats and favoring center

  10. #20
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,577

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 68Charger View Post
    I'd love to get a Garand in .308 , with adjustable gas system ( I know some of you are cringing, but hear me out)

    Since the only advantage 30-06 has over .308 is with heavier bullets... Which should not be shot out of a Garand...
    I am already setup to reload .308... So it fits better for me as a .308

    The only way I'd buy one in 30-06 is if it was beat to hell and priced like it... Just look at all the marks and let your imagination take over...
    A buddy of mine and I built our 7.62x51 Garands using an Italian parts kit. I ordered 2 receivers from the CMP while he got 2 kits. Basically, the barrel, the op rod, spring, and one of the handguards are 1/2-inch shorter to accommodate the shorter cartridge. We did it thinking there would be more surplus 7.62 available when OIF spun down. They work fine but really not much point in it once I got my M-1A.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •