Close
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    North Denver area,Colorado
    Posts
    525

    Default

    I don't have a cite handy, being on my phone at work, but there's a SCOTUS decision from a few decades ago, specifically barring what this initiative hopes to accomplish. IIRC (spqrzilla?) apportioning state legislative seats on anything but population is a failure to guarantee a republican form of government in that state, and there might have been something about equal protection in there as well.

    It's not a bad idea, but I don't see it standing even if it does pass.

    Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Ammosexual GilpinGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Rural Gilpin County
    Posts
    7,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by centrarchidae View Post
    I don't have a cite handy, being on my phone at work, but there's a SCOTUS decision from a few decades ago, specifically barring what this initiative hopes to accomplish. IIRC (spqrzilla?) apportioning state legislative seats on anything but population is a failure to guarantee a republican form of government in that state, and there might have been something about equal protection in there as well.

    It's not a bad idea, but I don't see it standing even if it does pass.

    Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
    i have heard others who are way smarter than me cite this same decision and deem it not apples to oranges. From what I heard (Rosen, etc.) this isn't the same thing as that case and it would be a stretch for it fail the smell test. IIRC the original case was based on some redistricing due to race. I'll have to look it up...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •