A tat by an artist or a scratcher are two very different things. Had a customer who had a great "Sailor Jerry" style ship on her chest. Would like to have studied it closer but...
A tat by an artist or a scratcher are two very different things. Had a customer who had a great "Sailor Jerry" style ship on her chest. Would like to have studied it closer but...
Micheal HoffHard times make strong men
Strong men create good times
Good times create weak men
Weak men create hard times
For purpose of this thread I don't think it's stigma so much as distraction. For print work and such most marketing firms don't want some random tattoo drawing attention away from what they want the focus to be.... usually the product or whatever they want to showcase the product. I don't think that there is much of a stigma with tattoos these days although sometimes you'll still see it from time to time but nothing like it once was.
I'm not fat, I'm tactically padded.
Tactical Commander - Fast Action Response Team (F.A.R.T.)
For my feedback Click Here.
Click: For anyone with a dog or pets, please read
"There is nothing in the world so permanent as a temporary emergency." - Robert A Heinlein The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Feedback for TheGrey
Jim, you know an artist called Jumbo out of Nyack, NY? He did my first piece. Had a partner named Howard Baum, I think it was.
There's a lot more of us ugly mf'ers out here than there are of you pretty people!
- Frank Zappa
Scrotum Diem - bag the day!
It's all shits and giggles until someone giggles and shits.....
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
In my case, it's not stigma, I just view it as Andy Warhol "touching up" a da Vinci or Titian. I won't pass judgment on a girl or guy for having tats but that doesn't mean I can't recognize a lot of them are already ugly now and many many more will be even uglier in 20-30 years time nor does it mean I think potential employers are wrong for discriminating against something that can cost them business (if it really will cost them business ... many times it's just an uninformed guess).
One of my former employers put it succinctly: NOT having a tattoo(piercing, whatever) will offend nobody. This was in a retail environment, where the salespeople already had to overcome the disadvantage of their youth relative to the client base by demonstrating a high level of product knowledge. In the modelling/advertising world I could see this as being much the same; you really don't want to narrow your opportunities with a tattoo or piercing that potential buyers for your image might find objectionable. We are supposed to be an "evolved" society where we don't form preconceived notions based on a person's outside appearance, but that is really just PC bullshit. Every single one of us makes these kinds of judgments every day, whether it's concerning the hoodie-wearing urban yute, the dress shirt wearing accountant looking guy, or the yoga pant wearing suburban soccer mom.
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?