TERRORISM, WIN, LOSE OR DRAW? (No Poll)

[merl]

Our troops are constrained by ROE, and the enemy addressed in this thread clearly is not. Isn't that the crux of the issue here?

What are you proposing the troops be allowed to to that they cannot do now? Multiple people have said change the ROE, take the gloves off. This sounds like a fluff sound bite to me, what should the troops be allowed to do that they cannot now do?

As a civilian ROE means "when can troops shoot?" Is there more to it than that?

edit:
I see Stoner added "Let's just try with the flow of Intel and allowing agencies to act on Intel." Thank you.
Since we already do use intel heavily, is the change here lowering the confirmation standards so we don't have to know for sure the intel is accurate?