Close
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 62
  1. #31
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It's just that if I was sitting at the bus stop, and some dude walked up to me and said, "See that guy over there? He just called me a honkey!" Sure I'd think the guy being pointed at was racist, but taken out of context, and only hearing that through word of mouth, I'd take my initial assessment with a grain of salt.

    I'm really trying to move away from being seen as an "Everything Obama Hater." That requires me to really vet things out and play the devil's advocate. I'm sure you understand.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  2. #32
    RRD3
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sturtle View Post
    I re read my last post and it didn't seem clear to me. When I said, "I wouldn't argue that is racist," I meant that I would agree with you that her comment WAS racist. I wanted to clear that up.

    Gotcha

  3. #33
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Here is the email I got about her from GOA.

    Obama Picks Anti-gun Judge for the Supreme Court
    -- Time to start contacting your Senators right away

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://www.gunowners.org


    Friday, May 29, 2009


    Unless you've taken a very long Memorial Day vacation, you've no doubt
    heard the big news.

    President Obama has picked an anti-gun radical to replace Justice David
    Souter on the Supreme Court.

    Obama's pick is Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is currently on the U.S.
    Court of Appeals for the Second District. There she has racked up an
    anti-Second Amendment record and has displayed contempt for the rule of
    law under the Constitution.

    The Heller decision put the Supreme Court in support of the
    Constitutional protection of the individual right to keep and bear arms.
    Sotomayor, a politically correct lover of centralized government power
    (as long as she is part of the power elite), immediately went into
    counter-attack mode against the Heller decision.

    Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which ruled
    in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to the
    states. As she and her cohorts claimed, the Supreme Court has not yet
    incorporated the states under the Second Amendment. Until then, she
    believes, the Second only applies to the District of Columbia.

    This is pure judicial arrogance -- something Sotomayor relishes (as long
    as she is one of the ruling judges). In fact, protection of the right
    to keep and bear arms was a major objective for enactment of the
    Fourteenth Amendment, as recently freed slaves were being disarmed and
    terrorized in their neighborhoods.

    But Sotomayor disdains this important right of individuals, as indicated
    by an earlier opinion from 2004. In United States v. Sanchez-Villar,
    she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental
    right."

    Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
    Fox Cable News reported yesterday that in her senior thesis at Princeton
    University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
    and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
    firearms ownership.

    Sotomayor's Second Amendment views go hand in hand with her politically
    correct views on the law and the role of judges.

    In a speech given at Duke University in 2005, she made it abundantly
    clear that judges are involved in making policy. Realizing that this
    did not sound very judicial (even though most judges act on this basis),
    Sotomayor tried to laugh off her brazen admission: "I know this is on
    tape and I should never say that, [audience laughing], because we don't
    make law -- I know. Um, okay. I know, I'm not promoting it, I'm not
    advocating it." The audience continued to laugh. They got the joke.

    But Sotomayor's joke will be on us and our liberties if she gets
    confirmed to the Supreme Court. And that is why we need to start
    contacting our Senators early and often, urging them to vote against
    this dangerous nomination.

    ACTION: Please contact your two Senators and urge them to oppose the
    nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. You can
    go to the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
    http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the
    pre-written e-mail message below.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  4. #34
    RRD3
    Guest

    Default

    I sent my feed back... don't think it'll do anything but it's best to let them know we are not happy with it no matter the effect.

  5. #35

    Default

    She is a racist pig! She thinks the second amendment belongs to the government not the people. She is just another stepping stone to the coming....

  6. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bailey CO
    Posts
    6,268

    Default

    I think Power makes a person Dumb. I mean she may have graduated from a fancy school but her common sense and actions are those of a dumby. She tries to act humble and thankful but it is an act.
    And I do think however she "thinks she" is better than most of the rest of the population and her stance on the second is just like the current admin. It SUX...

  7. #37
    COAR Founder, Admin Emeritas & Contributor Roger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    656

    Default

    She is anti-second ammendment, anti-capitalist, and has been overturned like 87% of the time.

    She will be confirmed and there is nothing you can do about it. Welcome to the age of Obama.

  8. #38
    RRD3
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger View Post
    She is anti-second ammendment, anti-capitalist, and has been overturned like 87% of the time.

    She will be confirmed and there is nothing you can do about it. Welcome to the age of Obama.

    +1


    Right on Roger. Plain and simple and to the meat of the matter.

  9. #39
    AK545Man
    Guest

    Default

    So basically she's just as fucked up as most other judges?

    The only difference being we know about her bullshit.

  10. #40
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Woodland Park
    Posts
    692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AK545Man View Post
    So basically she's just as fucked up as most other judges?
    No, she's more. Much more. At multiple levels.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •