Proposed Body Armor Ban

[davsel]

From http://www.alloutdoor.com/2014/08/08...kly+Newsletter

A California Congressman named Mike Honda has submitted H.R. 5344, “The Responsible Body Armor Possession Act,” to the United States House of Representatives. In a recent statement, Honda said, “There’s nothing more dangerous than what a well-armored, unstoppable active shooter can do. This bill is common-sense and long overdue.”

More "common-sense" legislation.
I doubt it will pass - this time.
But, get your armor while you still can.

[balyon885]

Guess I better order that plate carrier I've been holding out on.

[Zundfolge]

So I assume this would ban those bullet proof book bags and such for children?

Again, leftards putting the children first <-(note that the roll eyes smiley on this board is nowhere near sarcastic looking enough ... this one would be much better )

[balyon885]

So I assume this would ban those bullet proof book bags and such for children?

Again, leftards putting the children first <-(note that the roll eyes smiley on this board is nowhere near sarcastic looking enough ... this one would be much better )

Now you're thinking, that never crossed my mind. Anything for their agenda to "make us safer" I guess.

[SuperiorDG]

So I guess now the example used for the introduction of this bill are inaccurate.

“[W}hile speaking about my introduction of The Responsible Body Armor Possession Act, I referenced a shooting in Riverside County, California. My staff has been informed that some of the information I gave about that shooting, specifically that the shooter was wearing body armor, was based on media reports at the time which have turned out to be inaccurate,” Honda said.

“While this incident did not involve a gunman wearing body armor, there have been too many other cases where a well-armored gunman has injured and killed citizens and police officers,” Honda said. “This bill seeks to help law enforcement protect us, and themselves, in an active shooter situation.”

Please give your examples, as if this make the bill not stupid.

http://www.guns.com/2014/08/12/calif...of-body-armor/

[brutal]

Well, derpy, derpy, derp and Dee-dee-dee-dee. Some *L* politician used "unfacts" to support their stoopid, ill-informed, emotionally motivated position?

This is my shocked face.

[balyon885]

Body armor like guns, is already prohibited for felons to have in their possession. Any violent crime committed while wearing it can add charges, time and points to a person.

[Great-Kazoo]

Body armor like guns, is already prohibited for felons to have in their possession. Any violent crime committed while wearing it can add charges, time and points to a person.

You're new, word up. You keep bringing facts in here and word's gonna be out Stop it, for the children.

[balyon885]

You're new, word up. You keep bringing facts in here and word's gonna be out Stop it, for the children.

Oops..sorry, I meant...nooooo it can't be.

[Double00]

[QUOTE=SuperiorDG;1694713]So I guess now the example used for the introduction of this bill are inaccurate.

“[W}hile speaking about my introduction of The Responsible Body Armor Possession Act, I referenced a shooting in Riverside County, California. My staff has been informed that some of the information I gave about that shooting, specifically that the shooter was wearing body armor, was based on media reports at the time which have turned out to be inaccurate,” Honda said.

“While this incident did not involve a gunman wearing body armor, there have been too many other cases where a well-armored gunman has injured and killed citizens and police officers,” Honda said. “This bill seeks to help law enforcement protect us, and themselves, in an active shooter situation.”

Please give your examples, as if this make the bill not stupid.

http://www.guns.com/2014/08/12/calif...of-body-armor/[/QUOTIf
If you have ever been to Moreno Valley Ca. you will know everyone should wear body armor!