Quote Originally Posted by Big E3 View Post
I think that most people misinterpret "property rights" to give other individuals or businesses the right to take away our god given right to protect ourselves by simply putting up a sign that says "gun free zone". I believe whatever society allows us to legally do to protect ourselves should not be taken away by anyone with just a feel good sign. Only if they provide security and can "guarantee" no one else will be armed and only then do they have any right to disarm anyone. And by "guarantee" I mean they have now taken on the responsibility for my safety on there premises. This should apply to private and government as well. A business sign should read "no open carry of firearms, only legal concealed carry allowed". This way the people who feel it necessary and have taken the proper steps for personal protection could do so. And no open carry Rambo want to be idiots to scare all the soccer moms, kids and girly men.
Please show me in the constitution anything that backs up what you're asserting here, that one right trumps another. I can show you in the constitution where every one of my assertions have come from.

Keep in mind, I'm not defending their decision or their rules, only their right to make them as they see fit on private property, in which place nobody is forcing anyone to go, if they were forcing you to go there, then yes these rules infringe on your rights. YOU HAVE A CHOICE. And they have a choice as well, they can kick you off their property for ANY reason.

Would you allow someone to come on your property and do something you don't agree with? Even if they have a right to do it on public property or on their property?