Quote Originally Posted by MarkCO View Post
An attorney who "sticks to lack of security" will lose in a trial. Common man, standard of care in the industry tests will, by and large, show that most theaters lacked enough security to thwart the specific shooter in this case. Several LE articles, re-enactments, re-constructions have already been completed that state this was an outlier, uncommon, and would have been hard to stop.

There is no justice that will be exacted from these suits, just more attorneys putting more money in their pockets.


Mass gatherings of people in condition "white" makes for easy targets. Concerts, Movies, Malls...
Oh, I'm in 100% agreement of that, it's the only real thing that can come of this beyond establishing a possibility of liability for such things to business owners, and that part is pretty doubtful. I find it highly doubtful that any of the victims will see much if any money out of this unless the theater owner and his insurance decide to just cut some checks and settle the cases, and the plaintiffs choose to accept those checks.