Well i guess its time to talk about what on the Ballot

[Rabid]

Talk about it.
Amendment 64: Definition of person and child

Amendment 68: Horse racetrack casino gambling

Prop 104: School Board meeting requirements

Prop 105: Labeling of GMO foods

I will start.
Amendment 64: No, even if i cared its not the right way to go about it.

Amendment 68: No, i do not care if people gamble but a promise of money to education never works out. It always goes to the general fund and that is the last thing i want.

Prop 104: Yes, public is public.

Prop 105: Yes, only because it is a thorn in the back of companies that get away with trespassing to test others fields, disregard the constitution under a SCOTUS ruling and litigate against farmers that did nothing wrong but do it the way they always have for generations. I do not hate GMO foods but i hate the way the companies that make it happen are above the law.

[Rabid]

Ballot, sorry but can the mods fix the title.

ETA Thank you.

[sniper7]

Aw...I wanted to talk about the ballet.

[cstone]

Aw...I wanted to talk about the ballet.

Same here. I was thinking, wow, ok, Swan Lake, great thread topic

Yes, No, Yes, No...nice how that works out.

[TEAMRICO]

Ballot?................removes TuTu. awwwwwe.

[Irving]

I'd like more info about this casino. I plan to vote no, because the Constitution probably shouldn't be changed to get it, and certainly not by an out of state entity. Also for the reasons already mentioned.

[buffalobo]

No on the amendments, not every thing needs to be part of the state constitution.

Prop 104 - yes

Prop 105 - undecided still.

[Great-Kazoo]

Talk about it.
Amendment 64: Definition of person and child NO

Amendment 68: Horse racetrack casino gambling NO

Prop 104: School Board meeting requirements YES

Prop 105: Labeling of GMO foods NO This effects the small grower.

I will start.
Amendment 64: No, even if i cared its not the right way to go about it.

Amendment 68: No, i do not care if people gamble but a promise of money to education never works out. It always goes to the general fund and that is the last thing i want.

Prop 104: Yes, public is public.

Prop 105: Yes, only because it is a thorn in the back of companies that get away with trespassing to test others fields, disregard the constitution under a SCOTUS ruling and litigate against farmers that did nothing wrong but do it the way they always have for generations. I do not hate GMO foods but i hate the way the companies that make it happen are above the law.

[bryjcom]

I haven't made up my mind yet on the others, but I'm voting yes on the gmo labeling

[Eric P]

No -

Yes - I don't care where the money is promised to go. I have no problem with people gambling, and would rather have people come to Denver instead of Vegas to piss away their cash. Don't care that it's a Rhode island company, as opposed to Nevada or other state companies currently operating in the small towns.

Yes - all local government meeting should be open to the public.

No - most of this is in conflict with current labeling laws.