Close
Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 84
  1. #41
    M14PottyMouth bryjcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    1,900

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zundfolge View Post

    Prop 105: Labeling of GMO foods
    No. This is going to sound ungodly rude but I don't care. 99.999% of the anti-GMO hysteria is outright stupidity driven by leftist hatred of Western Civilization, Capitalism, Technology and built on a foundation of Critical Theory of Marxism. Creating a costly and confusing labeling scheme designed not to inform the public, but to harm business is a big part of why this country is in such a mess. I know there are some here that think GMOs are the most dangerous thing since sliced gulten and Monsanto is the devil but I think y'all are just silly and all this law will do is harm Colorado farmers.


    .
    Hey, if you want to eat GMO, be my guest.. I'd just like to know if I'm eating it.

    And I think there is a reason that countries around the world are banning more and more GMO crops. This amendment doesn't even ban them.. Just makes them label it..

    Its not just a bunch of leftists that think fucking with the genetic code of the world should be held with skepticism.




    Just look at these juicy rats!!! Tumors and all. Just feed them a little GMO and you too can have a nice plump cancer ridden rat!!!!

    Offering complete Heating, A/C, refrigeration installation and service in the Northern Colorado area.

    http://windsorheatingandair.com/

    https://www.ar-15.co/threads/20783-F...nd-replacement

  2. #42
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bryjcom View Post
    Hey, if you want to eat GMO, be my guest.. I'd just like to know if I'm eating it.

    And I think there is a reason that countries around the world are banning more and more GMO crops. This amendment doesn't even ban them.. Just makes them label it..
    Well 105 won't do that.

    All it will do is create confusion in the market place, give people inaccurate and confusing information and harm Colorado farmers and food producers (that last bit is what its designed to do ... harm "evil" capitalists farmers who should be producing organic food for free 'cause communism).
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

  3. #43
    M14PottyMouth bryjcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    1,900

    Default

    And exactly what will that "confusion" be???
    Offering complete Heating, A/C, refrigeration installation and service in the Northern Colorado area.

    http://windsorheatingandair.com/

    https://www.ar-15.co/threads/20783-F...nd-replacement

  4. #44
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Roggen Colorado
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bryjcom View Post
    And exactly what will that "confusion" be???
    The only thing you will see if it passes is that 99% of food will be labeled "may contain gmo's" or something along those lines... The only way to do non-gmo is to do like organic food, make it a niche, specialty (higher priced) market.

    Rather than retype everything, here's my farm's facebook page. Top post right now is my thoughts on the Prop 105...

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Frank...09152315787880

    Anyone who tells you GMO's are dangerous and causing problems is lying (either knowingly or unknowingly spreading a lie). The truth is GMO's make food production safer. I grew up around the chemicals that used to be needed to control pests and weeds pre-GMO's. They are NOT nice stuff, but I guess the other option is to produce less food and a) let some people starve and b) increase food costs significantly.

  5. #45
    M14PottyMouth bryjcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    1,900

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ColoFarmer View Post
    The only thing you will see if it passes is that 99% of food will be labeled "may contain gmo's" or something along those lines... The only way to do non-gmo is to do like organic food, make it a niche, specialty (higher priced) market.

    Hmmm.... Doesn't say that in the prop. GMO food will be labeled, "Produced With Genetic Engineering" Maybe I just don't know how to read????
    http://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_Mand...105_%282014%29

    Rather than retype everything, here's my farm's facebook page. Top post right now is my thoughts on the Prop 105...

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Frank...09152315787880

    Anyone who tells you GMO's are dangerous and causing problems is lying (either knowingly or unknowingly spreading a lie). The truth is GMO's make food production safer. I grew up around the chemicals that used to be needed to control pests and weeds pre-GMO's. They are NOT nice stuff, but I guess the other option is to produce less food and a) let some people starve and b) increase food costs significantly.

    Well that option may fuck up the genetic code of this planet, but hey, who cares.. You and Monsanto just made a little more money.

    By the way. It exempts products from animals that have been fed GMO, from being labeled..



    Personally I think I have the right to know if the corn I'm eating is genetically modified with Bt Delta Endotoxin.

    I know, I know... I must be CRAZY to want to know.....
    Offering complete Heating, A/C, refrigeration installation and service in the Northern Colorado area.

    http://windsorheatingandair.com/

    https://www.ar-15.co/threads/20783-F...nd-replacement

  6. #46
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Conifer
    Posts
    1,470

    Default

    Instead of creating a statewide label that is in contradiction to the federal labeling process, the people that don't want to worry about GMO in their food should just buy food that doesn't contain GMO. There are grocery chains and products that cater to these people. Otherwise just expect that most of the commercial food supply has some element of GMO. This is another instance of regulatory nonsense in response to people pushing their agenda on others.
    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
    Thomas Jefferson

    Feedback

  7. #47
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    So far I'm

    Amendment 67 - Nay
    Amednment 68 - Undecided
    Prop 104 - Yay
    Prop 105 - Nay

    I'd be fine with labeling GMOs if people weren't so stupid and uneducatedly opinionated about them.

  8. #48
    M14PottyMouth bryjcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    1,900

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MED View Post
    Instead of creating a statewide label that is in contradiction to the federal labeling process, the people that don't want to worry about GMO in their food should just buy food that doesn't contain GMO. There are grocery chains and products that cater to these people. Otherwise just expect that most of the commercial food supply has some element of GMO. This is another instance of regulatory nonsense in response to people pushing their agenda on others.

    Contradiction?????

    Are you really serious??????

    Putting a label that says it's GMO is somehow going to mess up the federal labeling process??? And I'm sure most of the people here that are against GMO labeling also bitch about the federal bureaucracies over reach with other aspects, but when a state decides to do it. "OH NO!!!! YOU CAN'T INTERFERE WITH THE AUTHORITY OF THE FEDERAL BUREAUCRACY!!!! "

    You guys are pro 10th amendment except when your not.








    Seriously guys....

    Stop with the ridiculous arguments...




    I just want to know what the hell I'm eating when I buy it at the local grocery store. That's not really a huge demand...
    Offering complete Heating, A/C, refrigeration installation and service in the Northern Colorado area.

    http://windsorheatingandair.com/

    https://www.ar-15.co/threads/20783-F...nd-replacement

  9. #49
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    If you already believe GMO to be bad for you, why do you need further intervention from the government to tell you what you already know?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  10. #50
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Conifer
    Posts
    1,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bryjcom View Post
    Contradiction?????

    Are you really serious??????

    Putting a label that says it's GMO is somehow going to mess up the federal labeling process??? And I'm sure most of the people here that are against GMO labeling also bitch about the federal bureaucracies over reach with other aspects, but when a state decides to do it. "OH NO!!!! YOU CAN'T INTERFERE WITH THE AUTHORITY OF THE FEDERAL BUREAUCRACY!!!! "

    You guys are pro 10th amendment except when your not.








    Seriously guys....

    Stop with the ridiculous arguments...




    I just want to know what the hell I'm eating when I buy it at the local grocery store. That's not really a huge demand...
    http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp.../Helme_MLR.pdf

    Specifically, look at page 359 and starting on 367. If this gets passed, it will likely end up in court, cost tax payer money, and get thrown out.
    Last edited by MED; 10-06-2014 at 18:38.
    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
    Thomas Jefferson

    Feedback

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •