On Prop 105. Concerns of SELECT FOOD aside, the mentality of the 105 ballot sponsor should be a warning to ANYONE who is voting this Nov. I know i've heard this before.
As always the buzz words are well placed.
THIS ISN'T A BAN. mmm sounds familiar
A REASONABLE FIRST STEP. Yeppers now i'm convinced WE MUST VOTE FOR LABELING, IT'S FOR THE CHILDREN.
http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news...ssue/17236095/
"I didn't have a goal of banning GMOs," Cooper, an Arvada resident, said. "But I believe in the U.S. we have personal freedom to make an informed choice about the food we're eating and what we're feeding our children.
"This isn't a ban," he added. "It's a label. And this isn't a warning label, it's for those people who are interested — to not choose blindly."
Under Proposition 105, meat and dairy products are exempt from labeling, as are beer, chewing gum, pure honey, restaurant food and school cafeteria food.
Due to Colorado's "single-subject rule," for ballot initiatives, Cooper said the Right to Know campaign could not include any of these other food items on its proposal.
"This is a reasonable first step," Cooper said. "We aren't trying to hurt anybody; all we're trying to do is find out what's in our food."




Reply With Quote

