So is the idea that they just relocate the left turns to side streets that theoretically have less traffic than the main thoroughfare?
So is the idea that they just relocate the left turns to side streets that theoretically have less traffic than the main thoroughfare?
"There are no finger prints under water."
You can make lefts in neighborhoods and such, but not on main streets. Like Wadsworth, Kipling, Alameda, Bowles, etc. would all be no left turn streets. The traffic lights at the cross of main intersections let 40% more traffic flow through since they don't have everyone sitting for the turns. The U-turns are mid-block as well, not actually at intersections. On less used feeder streets, they do use the traffic circles.
It has probably even saved tourists lives by not making them late in the "less inviting" parts of town.
Hmm, what do you know, they even have a web-page explaining it:
http://www.michiganhighways.org/inde...igan_left.html
I did not realize they were a "Michigan" thing since Detroit Metro is the only MI destination I have ever been to.
Last edited by MarkCO; 11-04-2014 at 11:06.
Interesting concept.
"There are no finger prints under water."
When I lived in Omaha, there were a number of "go right to turn left" intersections. A bit confusing, but actually quite practical once you get used to them.
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
If the government won't protect us from ourselves, who will?
Traffic engineers always annoy me. So much of what they "fix" is busy work. Like the moronic blinking yellow arrows that Aurora's retarded traffic department adopted for no reason.
Sayonara
I can't complain anymore. I drive 55 miles one way to work and see exactly 0 stoplights if I take a certain route. At most if I take the first exit into Raton I see 3.