3rd Party Did NOT Give Hick the Election

[bryjcom]

Bryan, your stats are disingenuous. The argument is, the third party votes caused another four years of hickenlooper, even though the goal was to remove hick. You cannot add the green party into hicks vote. If you do, you need to add the lib, dunafon and fiorino votes to his tally as in a sense all voted for him and against BB.

The goal was to remove hick, which failed due to the third party vote.

Not sure what you're really saying????

The point was that if there was NO 3rd party candidate then who would those people vote for? I'm sure some would not vote at all, but its a safe bet that the most of the green party votes would go to Hick, while most of the other 3rd party votes would go to Bob, being as those voters are "conservative".

When you tally them up Hick still wins.

If you have no 3rd party candidates and all those people who voted 3rd party did not vote, then Hick still wins.

No matter how you look at it, Hick still wins regardless of 3rd party votes or not.