Quote Originally Posted by Artema View Post
True neutrality would be to pay for specific speeds. 1.5 mb, 7 mb, 15 mb, 50 mb, etc. Charging based on how much data you transfer is what Net Neutrality would oppose. That opens up the carrier to offering special services that bypass that data cap, which is anti-competitive.
There is nothing in what has been proposed that says that charging based on how much data you transfer would be forbidden only that charging different people different rates for or throttling different kinds of traffic would be forbidden. This is my point though, you come here with a preconceived notion of what Net Neutrality is (like Gun Safety) and some politicritter starts spouting off about "Net Neutrality" which is this wonderful thing you want and then gives you something that is nothing like the Net Neutrality you have in your mind. THIS is what I expect from Obama and his ilk.

Quote Originally Posted by Artema View Post
So you're for government intervention? lol. I don't know what you're getting at. We're just spinning rhetoric here.
No, proponents of Net Neutrality are the ones for government intervention, I'm for leave it the fuck alone goddamnit!