Close
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    Grand Master Know It All 68Charger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canton, TX
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    They already voted to kill it- this is SO last year...

    http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-actio...un-arms-treaty

    Oh, and the number of votes to ratify the treaty would be 67. (2/3 majority)
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...

  2. #32
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric P View Post
    So on the 1st day of the new Senate, would a negative vote kill the treaty forever as far as the US is concerned. Or can a subsequent Senate confirm a previously rejected treaty?
    The Senate vote is a ratification; failure to ratify isn't the same as rejection and withdrawal from the treaty. The scum suckers can resubmit for ratification until a new President formally withdraws from the treaty. That was one of the dangers of the Kyoto Protocol.

  3. #33

  4. #34

    Default

    Love this quote in the comments:
    I keep waiting for 0bama to tell the muslims,“Stop clinging to your Guns and religion”
    Guess the UN will do it for him……….
    http://disciplejourney.com

    Make men large and strong and tyranny will bankrupt itself in making shackles for them.” – Rev. Henry Ward Beecher (1813-1887) US Abolitionist Preacher

    CIPCIP

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •