Close
Results 1 to 10 of 48

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner ZERO THEORY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong but if all the internal parts are still straight (have to be for that mag to function) then isn't the 'curve' really just a thicker body to create a curve and in which case wouldn't this actually be adding material to what is otherwise a much more slim but flat version? So added weight and thickness to a CCW piece? Sounds like snake oil more than anything but I'm sure in a world where marketing trumps all actual benefits (see RIP ammo for proof) it will sell well.

  2. #2
    Glock Armorer for sexual favors Jer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Loveland, CO
    Posts
    6,257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO THEORY View Post
    That's not my point and I'm not sure I'm explaining myself properly. Look at the thickness of the slide in relation to the barrel for instance and now compare that to the thickness of the pistol on either side of the barrel to similar firearms in the class. If the magazine is straight then that means that in order to get the curve they have to add material that otherwise wouldn't be there. It seems that unless the magazine were also curved you are just taking what would be the standard internal plane and just adding more material to the outside to get the curve. So your lines should extend down on either side of the barrel to show where the magazine and fire control group is and then everything on the outside is essentially not critical to the firearm aside from some degree of strength. If more is added than say what an XDs or Shield has then that's added thickness overall and weight even if it does curve. It's still excess. Does that make sense?
    Last edited by Jer; 11-19-2014 at 17:23.
    I'm not fat, I'm tactically padded.
    Tactical Commander - Fast Action Response Team (F.A.R.T.)
    For my feedback Click Here.
    Click: For anyone with a dog or pets, please read

  3. #3
    Grumpy Mountain Man crashdown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Tanaina Alaska
    Posts
    758

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    That's not my point and I'm not sure I'm explaining myself properly. Look at the thickness of the slide in relation to the barrel for instance and now compare that to the thickness of the pistol on either side of the barrel to similar firearms in the class. If the magazine is straight then that means that in order to get the curve they have to add material that otherwise wouldn't be there. It seems that unless the magazine were also curved you are just taking what would be the standard internal plain and just adding more material to the outside to get the curve. So your lines should extend down on either side of the barrel to show where the magazine and fire control group is and then everything on the outside is essentially not critical to the firearm aside from some degree of strength. If more is added than say what an XDs or Shield has then that's added thickness overall and weight even if it does curve. It's still excess. Does that make sense?
    I think I agree.... Based on the picture above, material on left might be added for structural rigidity, but that's about all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •