Ferguson

[blacklabel]

As darkness falls.... I'm glad to be far far away from Ferguson.

That's the truth.

[hurley842002]

"town"... never used that word.

LOL wow ok, like it makes the message any different.

[blacklabel]

There are some .mil, ex-mil, pro-american militia and other folks present there... If you get your info from the MSM, then you won't hear the truth.

Well fill us in so we have the truth.

[OtterbatHellcat]

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...itness-35.html

This one I couldn't get all the way through...it was killing me to read it.

[Big John]

As darkness falls.... I'm glad to be far far away from Ferguson.

[stenz]

#41 and #42 are unf*cking believable.....

[Duman]

Bummer. I was hoping for a SIG pie fight to go with my coffee.

[RblDiver]

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...itness-35.html

Lmao, boy howdy. Page 23 had a great bit, the detective was asking the guy to show visually how Wilson was standing over Brown (as the guy claimed he was doing). He wanted the witness to portray Wilson, and use the (female) attorney as reference to Brown in terms of position.

"Detective: OK, let's just make the assumption that she's on her knees, ok?" "Attorney: Want me to get on my knees?" "Detective: No ma'am. (Inaudible) (laughter)"

[cstone]

They actually are extremely believable...as fiction.

Anyone who interviews/interrogates for a living could sift through these transcripts. Transcripts are actually more difficult to follow because they lack the natural cues we use to communicate. As far as methods of communications, audio without video is better than video without audio. Video with audio is a half step behind being physically present.

Even truthful statements have inaccuracies within. Some of the questions asked by the FBI agent (noted as SA) and the Detective are very telling. The Detective is trying to get a first read from the witness, by letting him give an uninterrupted narrative. The SA gets hooked on the second or third known inaccuracy given by the witness and turns the interview into a more confrontational interview. The witness' attorney actually seems to be trying to help the interviewers, however, by the end when it is clear that the interviewers are going to turn the interview into a perjury investigation, she ends the interview and wants the recorder turned off.

IMO, the witness was reciting the narrative that had been rehearsed by everyone in the Brown family since the shooting. The blood stains, the make believe dialogue between the officer and Brown. Pretty typical and one of the many reasons this case would not have resulted in a guilty verdict if the case had gone to trial, again IMO.

[cstone]

"Detective: OK, let's just make the assumption that she's on her knees, ok?" "Attorney: Want me to get on my knees?" "Detective: No ma'am. (Inaudible) (laughter)"

Yeah, that would never have ended well. I don't know if the attorney was attempting to set up the interviewers or she was just naive. It doesn't matter, because they didn't take the bait.