Close
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,788

    Default Walmart clerk refuses to print engagement photo with a shotgun in it..

    http://www.wcnc.com/story/news/natio...-gun/21431161/

    DALLAS — Stephanie Wehner knew exactly what she wanted to do with an engagement photo she took with her fiancé holding his beloved 12-gauge Ruger Red Label shotgun.
    "It depicts our love for each other, and I wanted to be able to display those at the reception," Wehner said.
    With her wedding to Mitch Strobl scheduled for this weekend, she had to just tie up some loose ends — like ordering photo printouts online at Walmart.
    Wehner submitted 13 photos with varying poses, lighting, and background.
    "She came with the idea to take a creative picture where we include something that is important to us," Strobl said.
    One of the 13 photographs submitted included Mitch's shotgun. He said it was the first gun that he had purchased himself, calling it his "go-to" gun for outdoor sport.
    When Wehner — an employee at WFAA-TV owned by Gannett, the parent company of USA TODAY — arrived at the local Walmart store to pick up the prints, she was told the photo with the firearm would not be released.
    Stephanie Wehner said a Walmart clerk refused to print this engagement photo that showed her fiancee, Mitch Strobl, holding a shotgun.(Photo: Provided by Stephanie Wehner)


    "She was very nice, but very matter-of-fact, like she was not going to budge or give me my photo," Wehner said.
    She even recieved a slip from the clerk that read: "MINUS ONE 5 X 7. NO WEAPONS."
    The clerk at the Walmart told Wehner it was the store's "policy." Wehner was told she can't print pictures of guns.
    But it's the explanation that caught the couple off-guard. Wehner said the clerk told her the photo couldn't be released because the weapon would promote a "gang culture."
    "To automatically to be lumped into that category of a gang... that hits a little close to home for us, because that isn't our intent at all," Strobl said.
    A Walmart clerk wrote "NO WEAPONS" to explain why the store would not print an engagement photo that included a shotgun.(Photo: WFAA-TV, Dallas)


    Especially when you consider what he does for a living: Creating manuals for hunter safety and outdoor recreation.
    "I did that in this picture; I made sure the action was open... that is was a safe photograph," he said.
    A Walmart representative later said the chain has no policy against printing out pictures with firearms.
    "We had a new associate who was misinformed. Her actions are not consistent with our policy," the representative said. Walmart officials said the policies have been reiterated to employees at the store.
    Wehner and Strobl see this more as an attack on their First Amendment right to express themselves through photography.
    What the couple didn't want to turn this into was a debate about the Second Amendment.
    Wehner and Strobl hope to quickly remedy the problem and find another place to print the photo. For Wehner — who likes to check things off her wedding to-do list — this was a just a minor hurdle. She does say, however, it's a story that she can tell for years to come.
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  2. #2
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    I cannot figure out why people keep saying "move to Texas". Every day I read at least one story similar to this one. The place doesn't exactly sound like the bastion of freedom.
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  3. #3
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooskibar03 View Post
    I cannot figure out why people keep saying "move to Texas". Every day I read at least one story similar to this one. The place doesn't exactly sound like the bastion of freedom.
    Do the actions of one dumb clerk label the whole state? I bet you could find the same person in Idaho without too much trouble.

  4. #4
    So Very Special Special Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Justin, TX
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooskibar03 View Post
    I cannot figure out why people keep saying "move to Texas". Every day I read at least one story similar to this one. The place doesn't exactly sound like the bastion of freedom.
    The problem in the story was a stupid store clerk, not Texas laws. Yes, there are some issues here in Texas. There's no open carry of handguns and there are tougher qualification standards for acquiring your CCW permit (range qualifications). However, I'll take those any day since I can go to Cabelas and buy a 30-round mag for my AR-15 or buy a gun from a good ol' boy at a flea market without paying some FFL to ensure I'm still not a criminal.

  5. #5
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Just add it to the file of stupid Walmart employees- really nothing more.

  6. #6
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,788

    Default

    I see a bigger problem here. This is no different than refusing to print a picture of an interracial couple, or a gay couple for that matter. If the content is not illegal (i.e., underage pr0n), then the clerk should not even think twice about providing a service that her employer contracted to provide. The article states that there is no policy in place to justify the clerk's actions. She is not in a position to formulate such a policy on behalf of her employer. There would be a lot less stupidity in the world if people could just refrain from trying to impose their "moral" standards on others.
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  7. #7
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    I see a bigger problem here. This is no different than refusing to print a picture of an interracial couple, or a gay couple for that matter. If the content is not illegal (i.e., underage pr0n), then the clerk should not even think twice about providing a service that her employer contracted to provide. The article states that there is no policy in place to justify the clerk's actions. She is not in a position to formulate such a policy on behalf of her employer. There would be a lot less stupidity in the world if people could just refrain from trying to impose their "moral" standards on others.
    Exactly.
    Lawsuit.
    If a homo couple can FORCE a product to be produced by a business then the photo is the same thing.
    It is a product produced by a business.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  8. #8
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Elizabeth, CO
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    Exactly.
    Lawsuit.
    If a homo couple can FORCE a product to be produced by a business then the photo is the same thing.
    It is a product produced by a business.
    As much as I'd love this to be true, I believe it's all about protected classes. Gun owners are not and never will be. We are the villains.

  9. #9
    Witness Protection Reject rondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    8,307
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    Exactly.
    Lawsuit.
    If a homo couple can FORCE a product to be produced by a business then the photo is the same thing.
    It is a product produced by a business.
    Agree. That moron needs to become a "former" WalMart employee. There's no excuse for interjecting your personal beliefs into your job performance.
    There's a lot more of us ugly mf'ers out here than there are of you pretty people!

    - Frank Zappa

    Scrotum Diem - bag the day!

    It's all shits and giggles until someone giggles and shits.....

  10. #10
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Elizabeth, CO
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    There would be a lot less stupidity in the world if people could just refrain from trying to impose their "moral" standards on others.
    I call that the internet/social media effect. People hope on the "what's trending/I read it on the internet" wagon way too much.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •