Here is the new Cialis commercial for the superbowl:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-t...yt-cl=84359240
Here is the new Cialis commercial for the superbowl:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-t...yt-cl=84359240
It's kind of funny.
FYI https://www.ar-15.co/threads/28937-T...y-video-thread
"And stop f*cking cheating!"
![]()
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind
Fun with physics: a 2 psi difference makes the football weigh 1 gram less, which would make it arrive about .003 seconds slower on a 20 yard pass. This would account for a whopping 1mm of additional indentation. And with the rain on Sunday, it would likely make Brady's passes worse, if anything. Besides, it's a moot point. Indy scored once. Once. The Pats could've been throwing greased watermelons and still won.
Tom Brady is going to his 6th Super Bowl, and will likely win again. He's laughing all the way to the HOF.
Have I been ignorant to assume that both teams use the same ball? I've never actually wondered or put any thought into it until this came up, but wouldn't that solve the issue?
"There are no finger prints under water."
Each team brings their own balls to games, unless it's the Super Bowl (where balls are locked up and kept away from players). The referees inspect the two dozen or so balls that the teams plan to employ, and upon being cleared, they are greenlit for the teams' respective ball boys to shuffle in and out of play with cooperation from the line judges.
Brad Johnson discussed the other day how during the Oakland/Tampa Bay SB, they paid NFL ballboys to let them get access to the balls off the books (highly illegal, and big time "cheating" if you follow the same logic), so that they could "rough them up", allowing for better grip.
http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/bucs/b...-sb-37/2214490
I was rooting for the Pats, but a couple of your points are off IMO. Brady prefers the ball under inflated. QBs have their preferences, Rodgers likes them a little overinflated. As for the Pats blowing them out, they obviously did not know going into the game they would beat them so soundly. Looks like it was done to provide them with an edge. Had it been a close game, this would be huge.
If it was anyone else other than Patriots - doubt it would be a big deal. But let's face it- the Patriots and Bellichek have been caught breaking rules over the past 14 years. His resume in trying to get the upper hand speaks for itself. That's my issue.
The balls being wet probably accounted for a bigger difference, and the Pats would have won anyway.
...but it's still shady and shouldn't make the Pats feel at all proud about themselves.
Last edited by Gman; 01-22-2015 at 21:46.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
One of the cornerbacks for the colts said the pats could have been throwing bars of soap and still won...
Sent by a free-range electronic weasel, with no sense of personal space.