Close
Results 1 to 10 of 398

Thread: M855/ss109

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Machine Gunner Hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    Guys....have you actually read the ATF article.... Page 1? It clearly states this is only for Handguns.

    It is important to note that only projectiles that meet thestatutory definition of “armor piercing” – i.e., those made out of the specific listed materials thatmay be used in a handgun are subject to the statutory restrictions. As a result, manufacturersare, and will continue to be, free to manufacture projectiles from non-restricted materials,completely independent of the application of this framework or any exemptions
    [L]et me make clear what this bill does not do. Our legislation would not limit the availability of standard rifle ammunition with armor-piercing capability. We recognizethat soft body armor is not intended to stop high powered rifle cartridges. Time andagain Congressman Biaggi and I have stressed that only bullets capable of penetratingbody armor and designed to be fired from a handgun would be banned; rifle ammunitionwould not be covered.
    This looks more aimed at 5.7x28 since they have been wanting to go after that for years and since it is actual handgun ammo.

    Ummm still bad but wrong ammo. Somebody is trying to start another

    Looks like it might be working
    Last edited by Hound; 02-14-2015 at 19:21.
    My life working is only preparation for my life as a hermit.

    Feedback https://www.ar-15.co/threads/99005-Hound

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •