Can anyone tell me if the technical guidance has been reversed or changed in any way? I've been searching for the last 30 minutes and I'm not finding any revised guidance.
Specifically this piece.
The phrase “continuous” possession in HB 13-1224 shall be afforded its reasonable, every-day interpretation, which is the fact of having or holding property in one’s power or the exercise of dominion over property, that is uninterrupted in time, sequence, substance or extent. “Continuous possession” does not require a large-capacity magazine owner to maintain literally continuous physical possession of the magazine. “Continuous possession” is only lost by a voluntary relinquishment of dominion and control



Reply With Quote

