I'm a fan of that idea, but what if they do something particularly awful? Torture their victims, rape them with a pineapple, etc? Who doles out the punishment? Do we keep some of the deranged around to do the dirty work? Do we turn some unsuspecting government servant into a psychopathic killer? Is it ever okay to commit that sort of act and still consider yourself good and righteous?
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind
I'm opposed because what you are suggesting is government sponsored drug addiction.
![]()
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/p...hal-injection/
Seriously, why are they using these exotic ineffective drugs, when there are so many proven alternatives available? FFS, veterinary euthanasia is a science that has been refined for over a hundred years.“Because the Court declined to require that states follow scientific guidelines in determining their lethal injection procedures, states will be allowed to conduct additional human experimentation when they carry out executions by lethal injection,” Dale Baich, one of the attorneys for the prisoners, said in a statement.[Read the court’s opinion on lethal injection drug]
Midazolam was used in the execution of convicted murdered Clayton Lockett, who kicked and grimaced during his execution last year before dying 43 minutes after it began. A state investigation blamed the bungled procedure on poor placement of a needle during the injection. The same drug was also used in the execution of an Arizona inmate who took nearly two hours to die last year.
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
Why does it even need to be 'humane'? Once all doubt of guilt has been exhausted for crimes deserving of death and sentence imposed, I think there should be two tiers, firing squad on the low end, and incineration for those especially deserving...maybe a bit of adrenaline administered at the beginning of the process...
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
Yeah...I'm not too concerned about how much a prisoner suffers during a botched execution. Too much current lights the guy up a little bit? That's what fire extinguishers are for. Drugs burn during administration or don't work quickly? Administer more drugs.
Personally, I like the firing squad idea. I never understood why a shooter would be issued a blank round, though. The sound and recoil are noticeably different when using a blank round. It seems to me the shooter would know.
Stella - my best girl ever.
11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010
Don't wanna get shot by the police?
"Stop Resisting Arrest!"
Lethal injection of a .30 full metal jacket in the cerbral cortex. Pretty quick and inexpensive.
Probably nothing less expensive, faster, least painful, and more reusable than a quillotine.
The average time on death row more than doubled from 6 years and 2 months in 1984 to 14 years and one month by 2009. The primary reason inmates left death row is because their sentences or convictions were overturned (59.5%) and not because of execution (24.0%). As of September 26, 2011
http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view....ourceID=004433