Close
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    22,040
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Chicago group sues 3 communities over gun store regulations

    It's always somebody else's fault. Why is it so hard for Chicago to accept that their own laws and culture are to blame for their problems?

    The State of Illinois has some of the most stringent firearm & firearm-related laws in the country. When I lived there I couldn't even look at a box of ammo without first showing my Firearms Owners Identification (FOID) card. I once moved 2 blocks down the same street (Air Force base housing) and my FOID card was invalidated until I re-applied for a new FOID.

    In this situation, the firearms retailers were severely investigated and found to be doing everything by the letter of the law. Since the anti-gunners in Chicago couldn't find cause to go after the retailers, they decided they could go after the communities where the retailers exist.

    Chicago doesn't have a gun problem (other than not honoring lawful citizens Constitutional rights), they have a crime problem. But in typical anti-gunner fashion they're choosing to ignore the criminals and go after the tools used by the criminals. These criminals undoubtedly do not get their guns by buying from a legal retailer & waiting the required 72 hours (24 hours for rifles & shotguns) or many via straw purchases - they get the bulk of them by stealing them from lawful gun owners.

    Two mothers who lost sons to gun violence joined ministers and an activist Tuesday in a lawsuit against three Chicago suburbs, alleging that weak oversight of gun shops has allowed criminals to easily obtain weapons flowing into a city besieged by gun violence.

    The lawsuit accuses Lyons, Riverdale and Lincolnwood communities of violating the civil rights of residents in Chicago’s largely African American neighborhoods by failing to take concrete steps to make sure gun stores are not selling weapons to people who shouldn’t be allowed to carry them.
    The full story can be found at: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/08...cmp=latestnews
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  2. #2
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    Those municipalities should consider countersuing Chicago for causing their crime rate to increase based on the number of guns stolen from private homes.

    The only people who really make money out of these pointless lawsuits are lawyers.

    Is Chicago a sanctuary city?
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

  3. #3
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,835
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    LOL! It's Chicago, what do you expect?

    Maybe we should sue New York City for allowing some of its residents and leadership to be hypocritical fools. (SAFE Act, anyone?)
    Last edited by HoneyBadger; 07-08-2015 at 22:43.
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  4. #4
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theGinsue View Post
    It's always somebody else's fault. Why is it so hard for Chicago to accept that their own laws and culture are to blame for their problems?

    [snip]
    That's always what it comes down to. For years Shitcago has blamed the "accessibility" of guns from outside the city for their own failures.

    We can ban all guns, confiscate, melt them all down, and it would still be someone else's fault when their sons murder each other. I recall the honor student who was working hard to get out and make something of himself. Beaten to death while waiting for the school bus... With a 2x4 that just happened to be laying by the side of the street.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/2009/09...r-student.html


    But yeah, it's guns in the burbs that are problem!

  5. #5
    Varmiteer speedysst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Meeker, CO
    Posts
    658

    Default

    "They lost sons to gun violence." What a very vague term. How about "They had sons who were shot by people who don't give a damn who they hurt or kill." That would be a little more truthful.
    An Islamic terrorist is a lot like king salmon. Life is great until the SEALs show up.

    "Artillery lends dignity to what might otherwise be a vulgar brawl” - Frederick the Great

  6. #6
    High Power Shooter SamuraiCO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    869

    Default

    I often wonder how it is people can rationalize their decisions and embrace this train of thought about modern weapons when our history is so full of instances where tyranny and slavery happened at the end weapons against those who had none. For as long as we have written records this has been true and probably even before that.

    It is one of those instances where it is clear the difference in how some of us think and rationalize the facts versus others. It really surprises me how fast this change happens within society.

    You also see it clearly when there is any type of panic situation. Some are not able to process the information around them and become helpless, curl up in a fetal ball or cry out for help. Others are able to process and move forward and help themselves and help others.

    I often wonder if certain pathways in the brain turn off as we live in more populated centers and our survival mode is "turned off". Maybe this is why there is differences in MRI's between "conservative" and "progressive" thought processes. Differences in large population centers versus rural.

    No amount of sensible controls will work. If someone wants to do evil against someone else they will find an appropriate tool to do their bidding.
    Armageddon was yesterday, today we have a real problem.

    Despite what your momma told you violence does solve problems-The Craft

  7. #7
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SamuraiCO View Post
    I often wonder how it is people can rationalize their decisions and embrace this train of thought about modern weapons when our history is so full of instances where tyranny and slavery happened at the end weapons against those who had none. For as long as we have written records this has been true and probably even before that.
    "He/she may be a tyrant, but he's OUR tyrant, and anyway, we're counting on a trustee position over you lesser slaves".
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •