Say it isn't so, Whataburger?

[sabot_round]

I don't have issues with WB's stand. However, I can also see the other side of it. Not everyone can afford to fork out the fees for a CHP, and I think that we shouldn't ignore that fact. Just my!!

SR

[hurley842002]

I don't have issues with WB's stand. However, I can also see the other side of it. Not everyone can afford to fork out the fees for a CHP, and I think that we shouldn't ignore that fact. Just my!!

SR

Which is why I think CHP's are BS, but just because my wife can't afford a CHP (which she can't), doesn't mean WB should make a poor business decision and cater to my wife's needs, my wife should go elsewhere if it's that important to her.

(My wife doesn't OC, I was just using her situation as an example)

[Aloha_Shooter]

I don't have issues with WB's stand. However, I can also see the other side of it. Not everyone can afford to fork out the fees for a CHP, and I think that we shouldn't ignore that fact. Just my!!

SR

I understand that but the proper tactic then is to fight for Constitutional carry in your locale, not to violate someone else's property rights and possibly affect his/her income, turning allies into ... bystanders if not outright enemies.

[cstone]

Fight the jacket tax!

Why do I need to train, apply, pay, pass another background check, wait almost 90 days, just to put a jacket on? Is that some of that "common sense" gun control stuff I keep hearing about?

Most of the recent shootings in the news utilized guns purchased after a background check. But we need more laws to make more crimes to add onto the crimes already committed by murderers. Am I missing the "common sense" part?