Close
Results 1 to 10 of 99

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    Navy Times is reporting that TWO soldiers fired back. Unconfirmed if they hit the bad guy at this point. But it's a reasonable assumption that their return fire would have either slowed him down or made him retreat.

    http://www.navytimes.com/story/milit...nman/30426817/

    A Navy officer and a Marine fired their sidearms hoping to kill or subdue the gunman who murdered five service members last week in Chattanooga, Tennessee, according to multiple military officials familiar with internal reporting on the tragedy.
    It remains unclear whether either hit Muhammad Abdulazeez, who was shot and killed on July 16 after he gunned down four Marines and a sailor at the Navy Operational Support Center in Chattanooga. It's also unclear why they were armed, as it is against Defense Department policy for anyone other than military police or law enforcement to carry weapons on federal property.

  2. #2
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,942

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hollohas View Post
    Navy Times is reporting that TWO soldiers fired back. Unconfirmed if they hit the bad guy at this point. But it's a reasonable assumption that their return fire would have either slowed him down or made him retreat.

    http://www.navytimes.com/story/milit...nman/30426817/


    Convenient spin to bolster the "See, it wouldn't had made any difference if they were armed.." mentality.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  3. #3
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    Convenient spin to bolster the "See, it wouldn't had made any difference if they were armed.." mentality.
    Every round fired at the attacker mattered. PERIOD. Might have slowed him down, forced him to take cover, etc... All limiting his ability to increase casualties. They can spin however they'd like to. If guns aren't going to help in situations like this, why were the police able to resolve it using guns?!?

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Every round fired at the attacker mattered. PERIOD. Might have slowed him down, forced him to take cover, etc... All limiting his ability to increase casualties. They can spin however they'd like to. If guns aren't going to help in situations like this, why were the police able to resolve it using guns?!?
    Because they're the professionals...

    This whole thing just stinks. Period.
    http://disciplejourney.com

    Make men large and strong and tyranny will bankrupt itself in making shackles for them.” – Rev. Henry Ward Beecher (1813-1887) US Abolitionist Preacher

    CIPCIP

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •