Missed the early debates, but the pundits seemed to agree that Fiorina did the best, by far. Saw the later debate, with the 10 current front runners. In my opinion, this will begin the undoing of Trump. His answers were generally vague and lacking detail, but when he wouldn't rule out running against the nominee if it wasn't him and lashed out at Megan Kelly for bringing up some pretty negative comments he made about women in the past, I think he is done. Many Republicans won't vote for him if they suspect he will go independent, and with all the "war on women" hysteria on the left, some will believe the Donald is a misogynistic creep (maybe he is...).
I'm no fan of Bush, but I think he explained himself well. Walker was just as bland as bland can be. I thought those who did the best were Huckabee, Cruz, and Rubio. Cruz is my guy so I was inclined in that direction. Huckabee was surprisingly insightful, funny, and on-point with virtually every answer - I didn't expect that. Many pundits thought Christie did well supporting NSA data collection and his supposed "smackdown" of Rand Paul, but I saw it the opposite way - I thought Rand had the better arguments. Christie's were of the emotional variety (Hugging a family member of a terrorist victim), which Rand talked about freedom and the meaning of the Bill of Rights.
Anyway, it was more entertaining than I expected and I thought it worthwhile to watch. Just wish the Fox moderators weren't trying to be so cute with all of the banter between them. I