Thanks for the many replies.

I think we've come to agree that they should have warned me about paying double. The W/C company didn't care where the money came from. I should have been told during the settlement at the very least that I was paying the 33% of the PI limits regardless of how I settled. In this case I would know I was not only paying 1/3 on the 1/2 limits I was getting, but also the 1/2 limit I was giving away. The W/C co would have agreed to letting me keep the full policy limit and just payed me the 1/2 policy less on the other end. In my mind there is a clear conflict of interest for the W/C attorney to not make this clear and let me pay twice on that money.

Monky, PM inbound