Why not? When you as a proprietor or administrator of a property actively deny a person's ability to take a gun to a gun fight (or allow that person's ability to exercise their inalienable right to even the odds to defend themselves.) I believe that you yourself as the person who is denying that right takes on the responsibility of that individual for which you are disarming to ensure that they are as safe as they could be.
For those that choose to NOT carry guns, that proprietor or administrator of that location/property also is advertising that "hey come in you should be safe because we do not allow anyone (even criminals) in here with anything but their hands, and you should have as good a chance." "mano Y mano" than anyone else. And we are taking on the responsibility to even the odds if someone does not play fair.






Reply With Quote
