2016 Election/Debate Threads

[HoneyBadger]

As Aloha and Roberth said... I would support Trump if he was the Republican nominee. I despise Trump and you should too.

He is a crony capitalist by definition and really does nothing to restore individual liberty. I like the things he says about immigration and guns... but this is the same guy that supported both Clintons in their previous political endeavors and previously supported gun control at a national level. Apart from that, he's a rich celebrity who is running the election like a middle school class president contest, and that is reason enough to despise him. Guy was on Wrestenmania a few years ago. He's basically President Camacho from Idiocracy. I don't think he could get much done as president because he's so inflammatory. With that consideration, I also think that is a good thing because he has clearly abused the relationship between government and corporations in the past and I can't imagine in my wildest dreams that he would do anything to fix that, even if it WAS within the powers of the office of President of the United States. As an AD member of the military, I am terrified about his awful foreign policy pipe dreams.

My order of preference is:

1. Rand Paul
2. Ted Cruz
3. Gary Johnson/John McAffee?
3b. Ben Carson (although he has many areas that concern me as well... he is a very distant 3rd)
4. Donald Trump

[SG1]

As Aloha and Roberth said... I would support Trump if he was the Republican nominee. I despise Trump and you should too.

He is a crony capitalist by definition and really does nothing to restore individual liberty. I like the things he says about immigration and guns... but this is the same guy that supported both Clintons in their previous political endeavors and previously supported gun control at a national level. Apart from that, he's a rich celebrity who is running the election like a middle school class president contest, and that is reason enough to despise him. Guy was on Wrestenmania a few years ago. He's basically President Camacho from Idiocracy. I don't think he could get much done as president because he's so inflammatory. With that consideration, I also think that is a good thing because he has clearly abused the relationship between government and corporations in the past and I can't imagine in my wildest dreams that he would do anything to fix that, even if it WAS within the powers of the office of President of the United States. As an AD member of the military, I am terrified about his awful foreign policy pipe dreams.

My order of preference is:

1. Rand Paul
2. Ted Cruz
3. Gary Johnson/John McAffee?
3b. Ben Carson (although he has many areas that concern me as well... he is a very distant 3rd)
4. Donald Trump

The man bought who was for sale, and that was the Clintons.

Mcaffee is really running? I thought that was a joke.

Well he is done speaking on P.C which is a great thing. As for immigration, that alone will insure we secure our future as mass immigration (legal or otherwise) will create a one party state just as it did California, only on a nation scale.

You can not take people from peasant cultures, who values collectivism/statism and have no understand or value of Liberty, and who vote lockstep for the same crap they did back home, place them here and expect them to change, they will not change they will only reduce us to the same serfs they are.

Unrestricted Immigration=Restricted Liberty

Or

Restricted Immigration=Unrestricted Liberty

More and more we are picking Liberty over Immigration as we should have from the begin.

“maximum security at the borders and maximum liberty within the borders.”

[roberth]

Thank you HoneyBadger for your further explanation on Trump.

SG1 - I understand about Trump being opportunistic about the Klintons, doesn't have to mean that I accept it. This is a personal responsibility/personal conduct issue and Trump's conduct is lacking. He was already a billionaire, no reason to sully himself with the Klintons but he did.

You can not take people from peasant cultures, who values collectivism/statism and have no understand or value of Liberty, and who vote lockstep for the same crap they did back home, place them here and expect them to change, they will not change they will only reduce us to the same serfs they are.

I like this statement alot. We can apply it to Colorado, Colorado used to be a free state then CA and other leftist state people started moving here.

Did most of these immigrants adopt the freedoms CO presented 15 years ago? No! They changed CO into CA/NY.

[SG1]

Thank you HoneyBadger for your further explanation on Trump.

SG1 - I understand about Trump being opportunistic about the Klintons, doesn't have to mean that I accept it. This is a personal responsibility/personal conduct issue and Trump's conduct is lacking. He was already a billionaire, no reason to sully himself with the Klintons but he did.



I like this statement alot. We can apply it to Colorado, Colorado used to be a free state then CA and other leftist state people started moving here.

Did most of these immigrants adopt the freedoms CO presented 15 years ago? No! They changed CO into CA/NY.

You are more then welcome.



Stop Califroinication