-
I find it funny that many of the same people who questioned Obama's eligibility, now want everyone to just keep quiet about their favorite candidate's eligibility.
I don't care who it is in question. If they're ineligible, then they're ineligible. The acts/amendments in question need to be ruled on by the SCOTUS.
I believe an anchor baby (Rubio) and a man who was a Canadian citizen until 2014 (Cruz) are questionable candidates in need of a ruling.
There are plenty of Constitutional scholars who do not believe anchor babies should be granted citizenship, much less "natural born" citizenship. There is no question that anchor babies are "naturalized" citizens and therefore ineligible (Rubio).
The main problem with Cruz is whether or not his mother renounced her US Citizenship before his birth. If so, Cruz is definitely ineligible. If not, he needs to produce his CRBA form - which he has yet to do. However, the CRBA form would prove Cruz is a "naturalized" citizen and therefore ineligible.
Just because you like him does not mean we should ignore the law - which is precisely what the Dems got away with in 2008.
ETA: I also have no idea what Denniger means by "facially." I'd guess "factually," but he used it twice.
Last edited by davsel; 02-24-2016 at 02:30.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules