Quote Originally Posted by milwaukeeshaker View Post
So he is a past felon, he isn't in jail, he is probably able to vote, drive, leave the state whenever, buy and sell, in short if he has all of his other rights restored intact why can he not own a gun? Where does it say in the 2nd that a felon that is released cannot exercise his gun rights? If he is considered dangerous when with a firearm why is he free? Should he not be incarcerated if he is a danger to the public? Thoughts?
For me, that's not the point. The point is the politically correct are looking the other way in spite of the obvious violations because he's getting those awful guns off the street. It's the typical leftist viewpoint...the ends justifies the means. As long as it's something they agree with, to hell with the law.

I'm not a felon and as a citizen (formerly, anyway) of Colorado I couldn't buy/sell guns without background checks or without following the law. What makes this guy so special?

He needs to be prosecuted. Those who allowed this need to be prosecuted.