Close
Results 1 to 10 of 68

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #4
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TEAMRICO View Post
    Possibly if you sell ONE gun you will need to obtain an FFL.
    Except you don't qualify for an FFL unless you have a store front and tax ID number. So this new class of FFL holder is impossible under current rules (Clinton saw to it that the "kitchen table FFL was a thing of the past). What's funny is if they required every private seller to get an FFL then that could be the end of BGCs as FFL to FFL transactions don't involve a BGC.

    Quote Originally Posted by SA Friday View Post
    That's what everyone is going to be afraid of, but here's the crux of the matter. Short of substantial evidence that one is selling firearms for the sole purpose of making money and in quantities (or value) large enough to substantiate income, it can't be proven. Then throw in that the average ATF office doesn't have the manpower to go after some guy that sold two guns and made $100 out of it. It's below their threshold much less ever be picked up by an AUSA for prosecution. Last time I checked with the AUSA in the Denver area, short of a class 2 felony or half a million dollars in fraud or damages, it was below their threshold for prosecution. Granted, there are exceptions, but lets be realistic. They can't even get cases where some banger with a clean record straw purchased 6 Hi-Points from a shit house pawn shop on E. Colfax and then flipped them to make a grand.

    The sky is blue...
    This isn't meant to be used in a widespread way against the people, this is a setup for selective prosecutions. A tea party member here ... a gun rights activist there ... a "climate denier" over there ... a pro-life activist over here... a blogger there... a talk radio host over yonder.

    Just like the IRS has been weaponized against political enemies of the Regime, so this weaponizes F-Troop.

    It will create enough fear that people in our camp will stop fighting politically for fear that they'll lose their second amendment privileges (or at least that's their hope).


    No, for most of us this will have no impact (other than drive prices up and reduce the variety in the market place because there will be less people selling used guns out of fear). But the next president will reverse this silliness (unless its Hillary in which case we have two choices; slavery or war).


    The '94 AWB us a big part of the reason we never got a President Algore ... there's a good chance that this executive order may be what retires Hillary.

    Lets try to be positive here and not swim in FUD ... but lets not abandon a little bit of FUD here and there as it will energize people against the regime.
    Last edited by Zundfolge; 01-04-2016 at 22:07.
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •