Petition to remove Bill Clinton's name from the EPA building in DC

[Aloha_Shooter]

Thanks to Legal Insurrection: http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/01...-headquarters/

LI's point is that Bill Cosby's name is being removed from various venues because of his alleged illicit sexual practices so Bill Clinton should suffer from the same fate. As David French of National Review said, it's a bad day for the Clintons when Vox fairly explains the rape allegations against Bill. Then there's Red Alert Politics' summary of Clinton's 20+ sexual scandals: http://redalertpolitics.com/2015/12/...7PoA5SzRx3A.99

Actual whitehouse.gov petition is here: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov//pe...trict-columbia

Justice delayed is justice denied but it seems some of the chickens are finally coming home to roost.

[Zundfolge]

Where's the petition to Remove the EPA?

[68Charger]

Where's the petition to Remove the EPA?

I for one think it's appropriate that the EPA takes the name of a Man-Whore... I mean they have similar goals of screwing people, right?

[wctriumph]

Well, I signed, # 106 and they need a 100,000. Long way to go.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Well, I signed, # 106 and they need a 100,000. Long way to go.

True but that's okay. Having them reach a significant enough number that the WH and media have to notice it would be good enough, even without making 100K. In fact, it would be absolutely perfect if they don't hit 50 or 60 thousand until May so it becomes a topic of discussion right before the DNC convention.

[Gman]

Where's the petition to Remove the EPA?

I'd vote at least twice for that.

[Ah Pook]

Not a Clinton fan but I don't see why political innuendo should be considered indictment. If she was raped, where is the police report, the rape kit, etc. Not trying to belittle rape but accusing someone for political reasons is just wrong.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Bear in mind a lot of women didn't report rapes immediately in that timeframe -- no rape kits from the women accusing Cosby either. Broaddrick actually didn't accuse Clinton of rape until other cases came forward and refused to cooperate with investigations, possibly because she considered them motivated more by politics than justice. However, she had a number of contemporaneous witnesses who corroborate both the injuries to her lip and Hillary Clinton's actions at the time. The Dems swept numerous allegations of rape or assault by Clinton under the rug and confused the public by combining them with the numerous reports of his voluntary dalliances which most people didn't care about.
Remember, Clinton's impeachment was for misuse of his official powers to deny justice to someone he assaulted not because he had an affair. The Dems and leftwing media successfully labeled it a case about illicit sex rather than sexual assault and misuse of offical powers and they continue to confuse the public to this day.

[Skip]

So can I still call my Cosby sweater a "Cosby sweater?"

[snip]

misuse of his official powers

[snip]

And that's all we need to know. This 40-year train wreck...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_C...ct_allegations

...doesn't happen without the ability to control/suppress the truth.

[Bailey Guns]

Not a Clinton fan but I don't see why political innuendo should be considered indictment. If she was raped, where is the police report, the rape kit, etc. Not trying to belittle rape but accusing someone for political reasons is just wrong.

And don't forget that Clinton paid Paula Jones and her attorneys $850,000 to settle the case out of court. I don't doubt any of the allegations against Bill Clinton in the slightest. Especially Jones and Broaddrick.