Trump carries

[TFOGGER]

Ok...Trump has officially stepped in it with freedom loving Americans, when he wholeheartedly gushed about the effectiveness of "Stop and Frisk". Fuck...320 million citizens in this country, and these are our choices?

[hollohas]

Ok...Trump has officially stepped in it with freedom loving Americans, when he wholeheartedly gushed about the effectiveness of "Stop and Frisk". Fuck...320 million citizens in this country, and these are our choices?

I don't think so. None of his previous authoritarian comments/ideas hurt him, and this won't either. His supporters have simply ignored that characteristic all along.

People seem to understand he's the better option, even with comments like this. Hillary is no question a bigger threat to freedom. The choices suck, but one is unquestionably better than the other and I think for that reason alone, this won't damage his chances.

[roberth]

I don't think so. None of his previous authoritarian comments/ideas hurt him, and this won't either. His supporters have simply ignored that characteristic all along.

People seem to understand he's the better option, even with comments like this. Hillary is no question a bigger threat to freedom. The choices suck, but one is unquestionably better than the other and I think for that reason alone, this won't damage his chances.

Trumps authoritarian stuff disturbs me greatly. Trump is head and shoulders the better choice.

[Rumline]

Clearly trying to suck up to "law & order republicans"

[davsel]

Stupid idea to advocate for unconstitutional practices, no matter how well they worked.

[Irving]

How come no one is talking about his up coming rape trial?

[davsel]

How come no one is talking about his up coming rape trial?

Because the odds of success are not in the plaintiff's favor.

[Irving]

And?

[davsel]

And?

If the plaintiff is most likely a money hungry nobody who made up the whole story, and it appears obvious that is the case, then covering her accusations and likely downfall would appear to be picking on her. Media does not get points for picking on poor people, no matter who they are accusing.
If the story had any chance of credibility, it would be front-page news. It does not, and therefore is not.

[Irving]

If the plaintiff is most likely a money hungry nobody who made up the whole story, and it appears obvious that is the case, then covering her accusations and likely downfall would appear to be picking on her. Media does not get points for picking on poor people, no matter who they are accusing.
If the story had any chance of credibility, it would be front-page news. It does not, and therefore is not.

While that sounds reasonable, it really doesn't fit the idea that the media is controlled by liberals that will do anything and everything to hurt Trump amd help Hillary. Just the screams from anti-Trumpers alone about a rape case should make the news. Media thrives on controversy, whether they are the center of it or not, and I can't imagine any media outlet being afraid of looking like they are picking on a poor girl when in the same breath they'd be calling Trump a racist.

Heck, the only reason the Treyvon Martin case even went to trial was because of the media.