I've read some more of his stuff. He's a self-described "social liberal". He also says he's pro-gun. He obviously has no clue of the monumental contradiction he states in describing why he's pro-gun. He's probably not a flaming, communist-type liberal, but he's too left-leaning for me to really trust anything he says. Just my opinion.
I am pro-gun.
Because … I might someday have a good reason to shoot someone who is bigger than me or armed. If your reason for supporting gun ownership involves loyalty to a document written hundreds of years ago by slave-owners with muskets, you probably have some explaining to do. Don’t include me in that camp. I support gun rights because I think there is a good chance I might someday need to shoot a human. Period. If the Constitution prohibited personal gun ownership, I would have to consider violating that document, for my own sense of safety.