Also, without knowing the roof pitch, it's impossible to tell the sq footage of roof.
Also, without knowing the roof pitch, it's impossible to tell the sq footage of roof.
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind
It shouldn't matter since all the measurements were taken on the surface of each "shape." You're looking at the actual measurements, so I guess the eaves would be in scale with the ridges, and the hips in scale with the valleys. On this roof anyway, where everything is the same slope.
"There are no finger prints under water."
Exactly. Because it has slope, there is a third measurable dimension that the above "two rectangles" don't account for. Need to know the pitch(es) of the roof if you are looking for a surface area measurement.
Are you saying you measured from eve to ridge here? If so, and the pitch is consistent through out, then the rectangles method will work fine.
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind