Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    .
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florissant
    Posts
    4,380

    Default Judge allows Sandy Hook families to sue Bushmaster (Remington)

    Wonder how far this will go.

    http://www.newsweek.com/connecticut-...dismiss-447918

    In a major blow to gun companies, a judge in Connecticut on Thursday denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by 10 families affected by the December 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School against the maker of the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle used in the shooting.

    The three gun companies named in the case had argued for the lawsuit to be dismissed under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), or PLCAA for short. It’s a 2005 federal law that provides gun businesses general immunity from civil lawsuits. Connecticut State Judge Barbara Bellis rejected the gun companies’ motion.

  2. #2
    BIG PaPa ray1970's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    18,799
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Sweet. I can't wait to be in a traffic accident. I'm looking forward to suing Ford or Honda or whoever made the vehicle that was driven by the person that hit me.

  3. #3

    Default

    So tye will go to court. The gun manufacturers will argue PLCAA coverage. The judge will completely disregard the standing law and rule in favor of the suit. The Gun manufacturers will appeal. The appeal will overturn the lower courts clearly illegally made decision. The plaintiff's will then appeal to the next higher court. They will deny appeal and it will then die.

    No legal or monetary gain will be had by any plaintiff. The attorneys involved will make a minimum quarter million apiece. The Judges who disregarded the law because they don't give a fuck won't be removed or punished for their blatant disregard of standing law and legal precedent.

    Nothing will change....
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

  4. #4
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    This is right out of the Obama playbook of selective enforcement. Ignore the laws you don't like and enforce the ones you do....or simply just make up whatever you want.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  5. #5
    Machine Gunner Big E3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    1,209

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SA Friday View Post
    So tye will go to court. The gun manufacturers will argue PLCAA coverage. The judge will completely disregard the standing law and rule in favor of the suit. The Gun manufacturers will appeal. The appeal will overturn the lower courts clearly illegally made decision. The plaintiff's will then appeal to the next higher court. They will deny appeal and it will then die.

    No legal or monetary gain will be had by any plaintiff. The attorneys involved will make a minimum quarter million apiece. The Judges who disregarded the law because they don't give a fuck won't be removed or punished for their blatant disregard of standing law and legal precedent.

    Nothing will change....
    And the judges get moved to the short list of future demonrats SCOTUS appointees.
    Life's hard when you're stupid

    When the government came to take our guns, they knocked on the door. After our guns were gone, they never bothered knocking again - Holocaust Survivor

  6. #6
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    396

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ray1970 View Post
    Sweet. I can't wait to be in a traffic accident. I'm looking forward to suing Ford or Honda or whoever made the vehicle that was driven by the person that hit me.
    Exactly.

    Maybe, just maybe, the judge knows this is a crock of shit and is allowing this so there is a precedent and nothing like this ever happens again. Maybe....

  7. #7
    Varmiteer Ranger353's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Black Forest, CO.
    Posts
    722

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big E3 View Post
    And the judges get moved to the short list of future demonrats SCOTUS appointees.
    There is some logic behind this thought. What better way for an activist judge to get their name highlighted on a position they support.
    U.S. Marine Corps (retired)
    Gong Shooter Fanatic and Reloading Fool


  8. #8
    A FUN TITLE asmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Douglas County (Parker)
    Posts
    3,446

    Default

    This is a good thing, as FoxTrot alluded to.. Just the anti-gunners throwing their money away. Means they aren't spending it on other pursuits. I hope they spend millions on this.
    What is my joy if all hands, even the unclean, can reach into it? What is my wisdom, if even the fools can dictate to me? What is my freedom, if all creatures, even the botched and impotent, are my masters? What is my life, if I am but to bow, to agree and to obey?
    -- Ayn Rand, Anthem (Chapter 11)

  9. #9
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,939

    Default

    Look at what happened to the families that sued the ammunition seller that sold the Aurora perpetrator his ammunition.
    Lawsuit was denied and those families who brought the suit have to pay attorney fees. One even went so far as to whine on TV how it was going to force them to sell their house.

    Federal law plainly and clearly prohibits suits such as this.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  10. #10
    Varmiteer NFATrustGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    597

    Default

    I predict that one of the Bloombergs of the world will be bankrolling the Plaintiffs. It'll be a relatively inexpensive anti-gun advertising campaign for the likes of Bloomberg. When they lose and even if the Defendants attorney bankrupts the Plaintiffs it'll make a great story of how "guns ruin people's lives."

    'Course it's also possible that the suit will expose the hypocrisy and shallow thinking of the anti-gun crowd.
    No longer accepting new Trust clients. Pretty much out of the law business completely.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •