Obviously as part of your First Amendment rights you'll only agree to fully nude interviews.
Obviously as part of your First Amendment rights you'll only agree to fully nude interviews.
"There are no finger prints under water."
The NRA or some other organization ought to contact the Federal prosecutor in AZ and ask if they intend to file charges for admitted violations of multiple federal firearms laws.
Martin
If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.
BTW as far as whether the action was legal or not, clearly the purchaser of the gun was acting illegally. The seller, though, I don't think so. AFAIK AZ does not require BGC on FTF sales of guns, just like it was here in CO before July 2013.
It was probably Couric's intention to show that the seller of the gun was acting legally under Federal and State law unless he knew or should have known that the buyer was from another state, since the whole thrust of her campaign is to require background checks on ALL gun purchases.
Martin
If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.
Back when we could do those types of sales in Colorado, the responsibility of the seller extended to checking the ID of the buyer to make sure the buyer was a resident. It may not be the same way in Arizona.
"There are no finger prints under water."
It happens because the EPA or other agency being sued is a willing participant in the lawsuit. The bureaucrats realize they don't have authority to do what they want so they help Kooky Environmentalist Organization sue them for not doing their jobs the way KEO thinks they should. The agency concedes so-called legal "facts" in court and no only establishes a duty to do as the KEO wants but may even help steer taxpayer funds their way by agreeing to pay legal costs.
Since the AG doesn't want to take action against David Gregory or the IRS or VA officials, s/he uses prosecutorial discretion and declines to pursue the case "in the best interests of the taxpayer".