i would have thought you could see the need for insurance and registration for any vehicle using public roads. They have to get paid for somehow. The roads in CO are IMO terrible and a misappropriation of funds is my best guess as to why they aren't taken care of.
so say a bicyclist runs a red light or stop sign causing you to slam on your brakes to avoid him, you get rear ended, hit the bicyclist anyways. Now you have vehicle damage possible injuries and medical bills. How is this cyclist going to pay for it? What if he rides off or runs away, no license plate/registration tying that person to the accident and now you and the other driver are stuck dealing with your insurance....assuming you have the right coverage or full coverage.
You said yourself the number of bicyclists are going to increase, so obviously the number of bicycle related accidents will increase as well. Should we continue to make them immune from paying to register and carry insurance while traveling on public roads? Please explain how that is a dumb argument
im an equal opportunity hater. Doesn't matter who you are, if people do stupid shit I call them on it. When a collective group of people consistently do stupid shit I start to associate those people as being stupid. Not a hard concept to grasp.
i never said cyclists didn't pay taxes, they just aren't paying them for their bicycles to have access to public roads. And I want that to change along with enforcement for following the law and new safety restrictions requiring lights, turn signals, insurance and maybe a bicycle endorsement to be added to their drivers license while I'm at it.
and may 1000 cyclists receive flat tires too.
The general liability on home owners insurance would cover that loss. Many people don't own homes and don't carry general liability insurance. It is exactly the same thing as choosing not to have insurance for anything else in life.
I will say though, that the police can do a much better job if holding people accountable for things. Often times, if there is no vehicle involved, the police are just lazy and let them go.
"There are no finger prints under water."
I just wish CO would let me plate my RZR and drive it around town already.
Low-powered scooters (50cc) require a driver's license, liability insurance, registration, and can use bike lanes.
Yet, they are NOT allowed on roads with a speed limit over 40mph.
I have always wondered why are bicycles allowed on public roads with speed limits over 40mph, and require none of the above?
"I want this I want that." How does it feel to want so much that you cant have. Maybe you should run for public office and you can shove your stringent, selfish overbearing regulations down everyone's throat. Damn Im glad I dont ever have to share the road with you in any form because your selfishness and anger are prime ingredients for a violent road rage incident.
Last edited by speedysst; 06-09-2016 at 14:57.
An Islamic terrorist is a lot like king salmon. Life is great until the SEALs show up.
"Artillery lends dignity to what might otherwise be a vulgar brawl” - Frederick the Great
I hate getting stuck behind the cyclists that wont stay in their lane, but its really not much worse then the motorcycle riders that like to ride like idiots swerving in and out of traffic and riding in your blind spot. I drive 2 lane county roads a lot and i see a lot of both, but the motorcycles are worse taking up two lanes trying to act cool taking corners to fast, it is funny when they come around the corner in my lane and realize i am not swerving though. And the 49cc scooters that people ride when they get a DUI and lose their license, i just love following them down 65mph highways.
I would be more than happy to run for office and jam my agenda down liberals throats. Hope they have a great gag reflex cause I would jam so hard it would make a porn star gag.
And you will be sharing the road with me during elk season. I wouldn't ride your bike in September, you might get some elk blood on your cute little spandex jersey as I pass you.