Close
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,018

    Default

    Bloomberg likely gave them cash value for the guns in order for them to make their "statement"....

  2. #2
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Saudi Aurora
    Posts
    679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hurley842002 View Post
    Bloomberg likely gave them cash value for the guns in order for them to make their "statement"....
    This.

    I can almost guarantee Bloomberg or Anytown threw some cash their way for the litigation and is offering them even more cash if they win and have the guns destroyed. They'll pay fort hat kind of publicity all day long.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    .
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florissant
    Posts
    4,380

    Default

    The guy was a nut
    http://ktla.com/2015/08/27/identity-...crets-surface/

    Sounds like the multiple women who financed him should have a shot at the loot.

  4. #4
    Grand Master Know It All
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Dickshooter, ID
    Posts
    4,828

    Default

    Title completely misleading
    They want to destroy them but are in litigation which means they don't own them

  5. #5
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    N.W. Denver
    Posts
    1,413

    Default

    Within a month they will be crying broke and need government assistance
    If you want peace, prepare for war.

  6. #6

    Default

    If through litigation they end up getting the guns I am totally fine with them smashing them. It's their property, do with it as they wish.

    It'd be hypocritical for me to not want them to tell me what I can and can't do with my guns, but I turn around and tell them what they can do with theirs.

    Do I think it's a smart thing to do? of course not.

  7. #7
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RCCrawler View Post
    If through litigation they end up getting the guns I am totally fine with them smashing them. It's their property, do with it as they wish.

    It'd be hypocritical for me to not want them to tell me what I can and can't do with my guns, but I turn around and tell them what they can do with theirs.

    Do I think it's a smart thing to do? of course not.
    Totally agree. 1500 guns and a loot of ammo....pfft.

    Hell I would keep some and sell the rest.

  8. #8
    Feelings, Nothing more than feelings KS63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Unincorporated Arapahoe
    Posts
    2,483

    Default

    The $$$$ always wins.....
    If the Odds are equal, you're doing it wrong

    My Feedback: https://www.ar-15.co/threads/81619-KS63

  9. #9
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,454
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Stupid liberals. I hope they do destroy them. Fuck 'em. That way I know that money won't be going into the Sanders or Clinton election fund or some other worthless liberal cause.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  10. #10
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey Guns View Post
    Stupid liberals. I hope they do destroy them. Fuck 'em. That way I know that money won't be going into the Sanders or Clinton election fund or some other worthless liberal cause.
    Ha ha! Good point!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •